Question

After the death of Vladmir Lenin, Joseph Stalin came to power. Stalin forced a type of totalitarianism on the Soviet Union that many called Stalinism – a brutal form of communism led by a small group of leaders. Stalin forcibly purged (removed by execution or imprisonment) anyone who went against the Communist Party. His main goal was to change the Soviet Union from an agricultural economy to an industrial economy. Under Stalin, people who resisted were shot, sent to labor camps, or denied grain (which led to the starvation of millions of peasants). The Soviet Union grew strong during this time, but it was at a high human cost.
1. How did Joseph Stalin take control of the Soviet Union?


2. How did Stalin deal with those who opposed the Communist Party?


3. Why would Stalin want to change the Soviet Union from an agricultural (farming) to an industrial economy?

Emperor Hirohito - Japan
By the 1920s, Japan had already industrialized due the Meiji Restoration. Emperor Hirohito took the throne in 1926. He is often blamed for Japan’s aggressive expansion, but he had limited powers as emperor and served as more of a “figurehead”. Military leaders, such as Hideki Tojo, controlled the government throughout the 1930s (militarism). They set out to build a huge Japanese Empire in Asia with the goals of acquiring power, territory, and the ability to further industrialize.
1. How would you describe the Emperor of Japan?


2. Why did Japan need to expand?


3. What type of government was found in Japan?

Reflection
1. What do these four bullies have in common?


2. How are these four bullies different?

3. How do you think the League of Nations should have handled these countries?

Answers

GPT-4o mini
### Joseph Stalin - Soviet Union:

1. **How did Joseph Stalin take control of the Soviet Union?**
Joseph Stalin consolidated his power through a series of political maneuvers and purges. Following Lenin's death in 1924, he outmaneuvered rivals within the Communist Party, including Leon Trotsky, by forming alliances and eventually pushing them out of leadership roles. Stalin utilized his position as General Secretary of the Communist Party to place allies in key positions, thus gaining control over party decisions and state institutions.

2. **How did Stalin deal with those who opposed the Communist Party?**
Stalin dealt harshly with opposition through systematic purges. He enacted a campaign of widespread terror, leading to the arrest, execution, or imprisonment of perceived enemies, including political rivals, party members, intellectuals, and military leaders. Many were sent to the Gulag—labor camps characterized by inhumane conditions. Others faced public show trials that led to their execution. The Great Terror in the late 1930s exemplified this brutal repression.

3. **Why would Stalin want to change the Soviet Union from an agricultural (farming) to an industrial economy?**
Stalin aimed to transform the Soviet Union into a major industrial power to compete with Western nations. An industrial economy would facilitate the production of goods, improve military capabilities, and create jobs. Stalin believed rapid industrialization was necessary to strengthen the USSR’s position in global politics and to fulfill the goals of communism, enabling the country to become self-sufficient and reduce reliance on foreign nations.

---

### Emperor Hirohito - Japan

1. **How would you describe the Emperor of Japan?**
Emperor Hirohito is often described as a constitutional monarch with limited powers, primarily serving as a symbolic figurehead in a militaristic government. Despite being a revered figure and the ceremonial leader of Japan, real political power lay with military leaders and other government officials during his reign.

2. **Why did Japan need to expand?**
Japan sought to expand its empire to acquire additional resources, territories, and living space for its growing population. This expansion was motivated by the need for raw materials to fuel its industrial economy and to establish itself as a dominant power in Asia. Additionally, territorial expansion was seen as a way to enhance national security and assert Japan's influence.

3. **What type of government was found in Japan?**
Japan operated under a militaristic government during the 1930s, where military leaders gained significant control over the government and decision-making processes. While there remained an emperor symbolically at the helm, the real authority resided in the military, which pursued aggressive policies of expansionism and militarism.

---

### Reflection

1. **What do these four bullies have in common?**
All four figures—Joseph Stalin, Emperor Hirohito, and their respective regimes—exhibited authoritarian rule characterized by aggressive expansionist policies, oppression of political dissent, and the use of state power to achieve their objectives. They cultivated a cult of personality and suppressed opposition to maintain control over their nations.

2. **How are these four bullies different?**
While Stalin employed brutal totalitarian tactics aiming at industrial transformation and political consolidation within a communist framework, Hirohito's regime was marked by militarism and expansionism without direct political power in a constitutional sense. Their ideologies differed significantly: Stalin promoted communism, whereas Hirohito’s regime was nationalistic and imperialist. Additionally, Stalin's rule resulted in widespread purges and famines, while Japanese expansion often involved military conquests and colonialism in Asia.

3. **How do you think the League of Nations should have handled these countries?**
The League of Nations should have taken a firmer stance against the aggressive actions and human rights abuses of both the Soviet Union and Japan. Diplomatic engagement, economic sanctions, and collective security measures might have been proposed to deter expansionism. Establishing clearer protocols for addressing violations of international norms, promoting dialogue, and rallying global support against aggression could have potentially altered the course of events leading up to World War II. However, the League’s inherent weaknesses and reluctance to intervene effectively ultimately undermined its mission to maintain peace.