Which of the following would be the most accurate critique of international response to the genocide in Darfur?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Governments around the world never considered the events in Darfur to be crimes against humanity.
Governments around the world never considered the events in Darfur to be crimes against humanity.

International response was overall ineffective for several years, until the International Criminal Court charged the Sudanese government.
International response was overall ineffective for several years, until the International Criminal Court charged the Sudanese government.

International response was fast and effective, saving millions of lives.
International response was fast and effective, saving millions of lives.

Governments around the world created economic sanctions, and thus prevented the genocide in Darfur.

Answer 1

The most accurate critique of the international response to the genocide in Darfur would be:

International response was overall ineffective for several years, until the International Criminal Court charged the Sudanese government.

This statement reflects the reality that while there were discussions and some measures taken, the global response was often seen as insufficient and delayed in effectively addressing the crisis and protecting those affected in Darfur until later actions were taken by the International Criminal Court.