Determining the reliability of sources often depends on several factors, such as the expertise of the author, the publication's reputation, the recency of the information, and how thoroughly the information is backed by evidence.
-
An article published two months ago in a reputable technology magazine - This is likely to be a reliable source as it is recent and comes from a well-regarded publication.
-
A blog post published five years ago on a personal website - This is generally less reliable due to its age and the lack of an established authority.
-
An independent video essay published three months ago on a social media website - While the recency is good, the reliability may vary depending on the creator's expertise and source material.
-
A book published nine years ago in collaboration with multiple computer scientists - While not as recent, a book authored by experts likely contains in-depth and well-researched information, making it quite reliable.
Based on these considerations, the article published two months ago in a reputable technology magazine is likely the most reliable source. However, the book published nine years ago also holds strong reliability due to its collaborative authorship and in-depth analysis. If the context requires very current information, the magazine article would be preferable; if depth and scholarly rigor are prioritized, the book would be more reliable.