Question
In this excerpt from his address, President Roosevelt uses the fallacy "Every realist knows" rather than offering direct premises to support his claim that the democratic way of life is being directly assailed in every part of the world. What kind of evidence would you like to see that would make Roosevelt's conclusion about the state of the world both valid and sound? Would that improve or detract from this excerpt of his speech? Every realist knows that the democratic way of life is at this moment being directly assailed in every part of the world-assailed either by arms, or by secret spreading of poisonous propaganda by those who seek to destroy unity and promote discord in nations that are still at peace.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To evaluate President Roosevelt's claim that the democratic way of life is under direct assault worldwide, it would be helpful to see concrete evidence that supports this assertion. The following types of evidence could strengthen his conclusion and provide a more robust foundation for his argument:
1. **Specific Examples of Threats**: Detailed instances or case studies from various regions experiencing attacks on democracy would be persuasive. This could include information about countries where authoritarian regimes are rising, election interference, or instances of violent suppression of democratic movements.
2. **Statistics and Data**: Quantitative data showing trends over time in terms of democratic governance, such as the number of democracies versus autocracies, incidents of political violence, or success rates of democratic movements, could provide a clearer picture of the global landscape.
3. **Analysis of Propaganda Campaigns**: Evidence detailing the specific strategies and impacts of propaganda efforts aimed at undermining democratic institutions. This could include case studies from nations facing internal strife, supported by analyses from political scientists or think tanks.
4. **International Reactions**: Information about global responses to these threats, such as sanctions, diplomatic efforts, or mobilization of international coalitions to protect democracy, could underscore the seriousness of the situation.
5. **Historical Context**: A brief historical overview of periods of decline in democratic governance globally, drawing parallels to current events, could help situate his claims within a larger narrative.
Inclusion of this type of evidence would improve the excerpt by providing a more grounded, rational basis for Roosevelt's claims, making his argument not just an assertion but a well-supported argument. It would increase the validity and soundness of his conclusion by demonstrating that his views are not just subjective opinions but backed by observable facts and real-world implications.
Conversely, if the evidence presented undermined his claims or suggested that the threats to democracy were overstated, it could detract from the excerpt's original emotional and rhetorical impact, challenging not only his authority but also the urgency of his message. Balancing emotional appeal with factual backing would ultimately strengthen Roosevelt's address and enhance its effectiveness in rallying support for his cause.
1. **Specific Examples of Threats**: Detailed instances or case studies from various regions experiencing attacks on democracy would be persuasive. This could include information about countries where authoritarian regimes are rising, election interference, or instances of violent suppression of democratic movements.
2. **Statistics and Data**: Quantitative data showing trends over time in terms of democratic governance, such as the number of democracies versus autocracies, incidents of political violence, or success rates of democratic movements, could provide a clearer picture of the global landscape.
3. **Analysis of Propaganda Campaigns**: Evidence detailing the specific strategies and impacts of propaganda efforts aimed at undermining democratic institutions. This could include case studies from nations facing internal strife, supported by analyses from political scientists or think tanks.
4. **International Reactions**: Information about global responses to these threats, such as sanctions, diplomatic efforts, or mobilization of international coalitions to protect democracy, could underscore the seriousness of the situation.
5. **Historical Context**: A brief historical overview of periods of decline in democratic governance globally, drawing parallels to current events, could help situate his claims within a larger narrative.
Inclusion of this type of evidence would improve the excerpt by providing a more grounded, rational basis for Roosevelt's claims, making his argument not just an assertion but a well-supported argument. It would increase the validity and soundness of his conclusion by demonstrating that his views are not just subjective opinions but backed by observable facts and real-world implications.
Conversely, if the evidence presented undermined his claims or suggested that the threats to democracy were overstated, it could detract from the excerpt's original emotional and rhetorical impact, challenging not only his authority but also the urgency of his message. Balancing emotional appeal with factual backing would ultimately strengthen Roosevelt's address and enhance its effectiveness in rallying support for his cause.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!