Question
A student constructs a basic circuit linked to a 3-volt battery. Subsequently, the student links the circuit to two distinct resistors and documents the gathered data, as illustrated.
In Trial 2, the student employed a higher resistance compared to Trial 1. The student asserts that the rise in resistance resulted in a reduction in current. Which statement can be utilized to substantiate the student's assertion?
(1 point)
Responses
The current recorded in Trial 2 was 0.050 amperes lower than that in Trial 1.
The current recorded in Trial 2 was 0.050 amperes lower than that in Trial 1.
The current in Trial 2 was 0.005 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.
The current in Trial 2 was 0.005 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.
The current recorded in Trial 2 was 0.150 amperes lower than that in Trial 1.
The current recorded in Trial 2 was 0.150 amperes lower than that in Trial 1.
The current in Trial 2 was 0.015 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.
The current in Trial 2 was 0.015 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.
Skip to navigation
In Trial 2, the student employed a higher resistance compared to Trial 1. The student asserts that the rise in resistance resulted in a reduction in current. Which statement can be utilized to substantiate the student's assertion?
(1 point)
Responses
The current recorded in Trial 2 was 0.050 amperes lower than that in Trial 1.
The current recorded in Trial 2 was 0.050 amperes lower than that in Trial 1.
The current in Trial 2 was 0.005 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.
The current in Trial 2 was 0.005 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.
The current recorded in Trial 2 was 0.150 amperes lower than that in Trial 1.
The current recorded in Trial 2 was 0.150 amperes lower than that in Trial 1.
The current in Trial 2 was 0.015 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.
The current in Trial 2 was 0.015 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.
Skip to navigation
Answers
GPT-4o mini
To substantiate the student's assertion that an increase in resistance results in a decrease in current, we need to look for a statement that indicates a reduction in current when the resistance is increased.
If the data provided indicates that the current in Trial 2 is lower than in Trial 1 due to a higher resistance, then the appropriate statement would be the one that provides the specific difference in current.
Among the options presented, any statement indicating a decrease in current for Trial 2 compared to Trial 1 would serve this purpose.
Assuming the correct answer is a factual statement of the current differences:
- If "The current in Trial 2 was 0.005 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1" is one of the choices, then it accurately supports the assertion based on the relationship defined by Ohm's law (V = IR), where an increase in resistance (R) will lead to a decrease in current (I) given a constant voltage (V).
Thus, the most relevant choice you provided supporting the assertion is:
**The current in Trial 2 was 0.005 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.**
Please refer to the actual recorded values from Trials 1 and 2 to verify the correctness of this conclusion.
If the data provided indicates that the current in Trial 2 is lower than in Trial 1 due to a higher resistance, then the appropriate statement would be the one that provides the specific difference in current.
Among the options presented, any statement indicating a decrease in current for Trial 2 compared to Trial 1 would serve this purpose.
Assuming the correct answer is a factual statement of the current differences:
- If "The current in Trial 2 was 0.005 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1" is one of the choices, then it accurately supports the assertion based on the relationship defined by Ohm's law (V = IR), where an increase in resistance (R) will lead to a decrease in current (I) given a constant voltage (V).
Thus, the most relevant choice you provided supporting the assertion is:
**The current in Trial 2 was 0.005 amperes lower than the current in Trial 1.**
Please refer to the actual recorded values from Trials 1 and 2 to verify the correctness of this conclusion.