Question

Consider the argument you just wrote concerning the possible harm of AI. What is another medium you could use to make this argument? Describe the benefits of using this medium to make your argument. What audience would be most appropriate for this medium? Your answer should be a minimum of five sentences. (4 points)

here is the paragraph

The first article is really positive about AI, saying it can do great things for society, but it also mentions that we need some rules to keep things safe. On the other hand, the second article is more worried about AI and talks about the big problems it could cause, like taking away jobs, spreading fake news, and making people less skilled. I think the second article has a better argument because it gives clear examples of how AI can be dangerous, like the risk of fake news and job losses.In my view, while AI could really make our lives better, it also has risks that might be worse than the good things it brings, especially if we don’t keep it under control. For instance, if robots and computers take over jobs, a lot of people could lose their work and have a hard time finding new jobs. There’s also a big worry about fake news because AI can create really convincing but false information that could confuse or trick people. Plus, if we rely too much on AI, we might lose our own skills and ability to think critically, making us less capable of doing things on our own. So, while AI sounds exciting, it’s super important for us to be careful and make sure that it helps us instead of causing problems.

Answers

GPT-4o mini
One effective medium to present the argument about the potential harms of AI could be a short documentary film. This medium allows for a visual and auditory exploration of the topic, utilizing interviews, expert opinions, and real-life examples that illustrate the arguments made in the articles. The benefits of a documentary include its ability to engage viewers emotionally through storytelling, making complex issues more relatable and understandable. Additionally, visuals can help strengthen the points being made, providing compelling evidence and fostering a greater sense of urgency about the risks associated with unchecked AI development. The most appropriate audience for this medium would be general viewers, including policymakers, educators, and members of the tech community, who may not have in-depth knowledge of AI but are influential stakeholders in discussions about its future. By reaching this audience through a documentary, it becomes possible to raise awareness and encourage thoughtful dialogue about responsible AI practices.