To find the maximum value of the expression
\[ f(x, y, z) = 3x + 4y + 5z + x^3 + \frac{4x^2 y}{z} + \frac{z^5}{xy^2} \]
given the constraint
\[ g(x, y, z) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 1 = 0, \]
we will utilize the method of Lagrange multipliers.
Define \( L(x, y, z, \lambda) = f(x, y, z) - \lambda g(x, y, z) \). Thus, we have
\[ L(x, y, z, \lambda) = 3x + 4y + 5z + x^3 + \frac{4x^2 y}{z} + \frac{z^5}{xy^2} - \lambda (x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 1). \]
To find the critical points, we compute the gradients and set them equal to zero.
The partial derivatives are computed as follows:
\[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 3 + 3x^2 + \frac{8xy}{z} - 2\lambda x, \] \[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial y} = 4 + \frac{4x^2}{z} - \frac{2z^5}{xy^3} - 2\lambda y, \] \[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial z} = 5 + \frac{5z^4}{xy^2} - \frac{4x^2y}{z^2} - 2\lambda z, \] \[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial \lambda} = -(x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 1). \]
We set each of these equal to zero:
- \( 3 + 3x^2 + \frac{8xy}{z} - 2\lambda x = 0, \)
- \( 4 + \frac{4x^2}{z} - \frac{2z^5}{xy^3} - 2\lambda y = 0, \)
- \( 5 + \frac{5z^4}{xy^2} - \frac{4x^2y}{z^2} - 2\lambda z = 0, \)
- \( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 1 = 0. \)
This is a complicated system, and solving it analytically may be challenging. A natural alternative is to utilize numerical or computational methods to analyze the function under the given constraint.
We can consider evaluating the function at specific values of \( x, y, z \) that satisfy \( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 \):
-
Try \( (1, 0, 0) \): \[ f(1, 0, 0) = 3(1) + 4(0) + 5(0) + 1^3 + 0 + 0 = 3 + 1 = 4. \]
-
Try \( (0, 1, 0) \): \[ f(0, 1, 0) = 3(0) + 4(1) + 5(0) + 0 + 0 + 0 = 4. \]
-
Try \( (0, 0, 1) \): \[ f(0, 0, 1) = 3(0) + 4(0) + 5(1) + 0 + 0 + 0 = 5. \]
-
Try \( (0, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}) \): \[ f(0, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}) = 3(0) + 4\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right) + 5\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right) + 0 + 0 + 0 = \frac{9}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 6.36. \]
After analyzing the extreme cases and potential critical points, we find that \(f(0, 0, 1) = 5\) and \(f(0, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})\) gives a value close to \(6.36\).
Thus, the maximum value found among these evaluations is clearly greater than 5. Continuing similarly or through numerical optimization techniques will yield insight.
Based on the evaluation of strategic points, we conclude:
\[ \text{The maximum value is approximately } \textbf{6.36.} \]
Due to the complexity and reliance on multiple evaluations, we can verify that the maximum may theoretically reach its peak at well-computed rationalized points close to these values. Further numerical work would be warranted for pinpoint accuracy.
To ensure no step is skipped, the best exact point found in rational bounds provides \( 6.36 \) as an approximation to maximize function outputs at those defined sections. Hence the assessed maximum functional accumulation reaches:
\(\boxed{6}\).