Question
Analyze the Three-fifths Compromise. Which state would be hurt the worst in terms of distribution of power if enslaved people were not counted toward population at least 60 percent?(1 point)
Responses
Rhode Island
Rhode Island
New York
New York
Maryland
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Responses
Rhode Island
Rhode Island
New York
New York
Maryland
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The Three-fifths Compromise was a pivotal agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It allowed states to count three-fifths of their enslaved population when apportioning representation in the House of Representatives and for tax purposes. This compromise was designed to balance the interests of slaveholding states and free states.
To analyze which state would be hurt the worst in terms of the distribution of power if enslaved people were not counted at all, we need to look at the context of the states listed:
1. **Rhode Island** - A smaller state with a less significant enslaved population. The impact on political power from changes in representation would be minimal for Rhode Island.
2. **New York** - A free state with a sizable population of free citizens and fewer enslaved individuals compared to Southern states. If enslaved individuals were not counted, New York would not be significantly affected either.
3. **Maryland** - A border state with a mix of enslaved and free populations. Maryland had a considerable number of enslaved people, and thus losing representation from them not being counted would impact its political clout.
4. **Pennsylvania** - Also a free state and one with a strong stance against slavery. Similar to New York, Pennsylvania would not be drastically affected.
Given this analysis, **Maryland** would be the state most adversely affected by the Three-fifths Compromise if enslaved people were not counted toward population at least at 60%. Since Maryland had a significant enslaved population, not counting them would lead to a diminished representation in Congress, thereby reducing its overall political power relative to other states.
To analyze which state would be hurt the worst in terms of the distribution of power if enslaved people were not counted at all, we need to look at the context of the states listed:
1. **Rhode Island** - A smaller state with a less significant enslaved population. The impact on political power from changes in representation would be minimal for Rhode Island.
2. **New York** - A free state with a sizable population of free citizens and fewer enslaved individuals compared to Southern states. If enslaved individuals were not counted, New York would not be significantly affected either.
3. **Maryland** - A border state with a mix of enslaved and free populations. Maryland had a considerable number of enslaved people, and thus losing representation from them not being counted would impact its political clout.
4. **Pennsylvania** - Also a free state and one with a strong stance against slavery. Similar to New York, Pennsylvania would not be drastically affected.
Given this analysis, **Maryland** would be the state most adversely affected by the Three-fifths Compromise if enslaved people were not counted toward population at least at 60%. Since Maryland had a significant enslaved population, not counting them would lead to a diminished representation in Congress, thereby reducing its overall political power relative to other states.