Claim 1: During summer vacation, I take a walk every day after lunch. The air is refreshing and helps me prepare for the rest of the day. I also love taking a few minutes to break up the day. I can’t imagine going without my lunchtime walk! During the school year, students should be able to take a walk outside after lunch every day. Claim 2: Time outside promotes physical health and encourages social interaction and collaboration among students. In addition to anchoring students to the real world, research has shown that time outside leads to greater productivity and better learning outcomes. For these reasons, students should have time outside during every school day. Question Use the two claims to answer the question. How does the style of claim 1 engage the audience in a way that the style of claim 2 does not? (1 point) Responses Claim 1 explains some benefits of outdoor time in order to gain support from its audience. Claim 1 explains some benefits of outdoor time in order to gain support from its audience. Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way. Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way. Claim 1 uses formal and objective language to convey factual details to the audience. Claim 1 uses formal and objective language to convey factual details to the audience. Claim 1 explains how research supports its claim in order to convey authority to its audience.
1 answer
The correct response is: Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way.
This response highlights how Claim 1 engages the audience through a personal touch and relatable experience, making it more engaging and accessible compared to the more formal and objective style of Claim 2.
