The people’s notion to slaughter the goats is based on a religious or traditional belief. This idea may arise from the stress the population has been facing or has experienced during the time of the natural disaster or may have originated from someone attempting to take advantage of the situation. It is a non-scientific belief, as scientific theories are based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly tested and confirmed through experiments and observations. As such, this theory or superstitious notion cannot be substantiated. It is an open idea that can be examined, but the desired outcome will not materialize.

Question

President Yudhoyono’s response to the SMS appeal regarding the sacrifice of goats was a fitting reply. Natural disasters occur independently and cannot be halted simply because some goats are slaughtered. By dismissing the fanciful notion of goat sacrifices, he appeals to the populace’s common sense and rational discourse. He underscores the necessity to be realistic about the causes of natural disasters and encourages citizens to find comfort in prayer rather than in rituals devoid of scientific foundation. Furthermore, he states that such actions can incite even more panic among the general public and orders an investigation into the origin of the SMS appeal. President Yudhoyono reassures his constituents that any potential alerts regarding natural disasters will always be publicly broadcast through national television or radio, ensuring that the public will consistently be well-informed.

In Indonesia, where superstition frequently intertwines with religion, such beliefs can gain traction, particularly during challenging times. In such instances, having a rational leader who can think critically and lead with a clear mind can make the crucial difference between life and death. A notable example would be during the  earthquake in September 2018 that struck the island of Sulawesi, which triggered a tsunami that killed bolt of people and destroyed infrastructures. President Joko Widodo’s response was to remain calm and that his government was working on immediate reliefs for the earthquake’s victim. He was also on the ground at where the disaster took place to show his citizens thay were affected support and to reassure them that their needs will be met.

The superstitious idea to sacrifice the goats is rooted in a religious or traditional belief that natural disasters are caused by divine forces. This theory cannot be tested, as natural disasters are caused by natural phenomena and not by divine intervention. This superstitious theory can be examined, but the results will never be consistent, as it lacks a scientific foundation. Therefore, it is safe to assert that regardless of whether the president slaughters a thousand goats each time a natural disaster occurs, the outcome will always be a matter of chance. Natural disasters transpire at their own will and may cease abruptly, regardless of whether a thousand goats have been sacrificed.
To conclude, this idea is not scientifically based and as such cannot be scientifically tested. It is only a religious idea or belief and will always be only that.

Does my commentary make sense or follow a logical order and if it doesn't can suggest ways on how to fix and use those examples to fix my essay but don't change it keep the structure the same and all my ideas just make sure it follows a logical order

GPT-4o mini · Answer

Your commentary contains insightful observations about the relationship between superstition, leadership, and natural disasters, but it could benefit from a clearer logical flow to enhance coherence and readability. Below are suggestions that help to better organize your essay while retaining your original ideas:

Introduction of Themes: Start with a brief overview of what your commentary will cover—the intertwining of superstition and scientific understanding, the response of leadership during crises, and the implications of these elements on public behavior.
Clearer Segmentation: Break the text into distinct sections with smooth transitions. For instance, your discussion on President Yudhoyono can be a separate paragraph, followed by President Joko Widodo's example. This helps emphasize the differences and similarities in leadership responses.
Eliminate Redundancies:Reduce repetition of ideas, such as the idea that rituals lack scientific basis. You mention this several times, so consolidating such points will make your argument stronger without becoming repetitive.

Here's a revised version of your commentary, structured with these suggestions in mind:

The people's notion to slaughter goats is rooted in religious or traditional beliefs regarding the causes of natural disasters. This idea may arise due to the stress the population has been facing during challenging times, or it may be an attempt by someone to exploit the situation. However, this is a non-scientific belief; scientific theories are based on repeatedly tested and confirmed facts. As such, this theory or superstitious notion cannot be substantiated. While it is an open idea that can be examined, the desired outcome of such actions will not materialize.

In response to the SMS appeal regarding goat sacrifices, President Yudhoyono provided a fitting reply that emphasized rational discourse. He pointed out that natural disasters occur independently and cannot be stopped merely by the slaughter of goats. By dismissing the fanciful notion of goat sacrifices, he appealed to the populace's common sense and underscored the importance of recognizing the actual causes of natural disasters. Instead of focusing on rituals devoid of scientific foundation, he encouraged citizens to find solace in prayer. Furthermore, he expressed concern that such actions could incite panic and ordered an investigation into the origin of the SMS appeal. Yudhoyono reassured his constituents that alerts regarding natural disasters would always be broadcast publicly through national television or radio, ensuring the public remained well-informed.

In Indonesia, where superstition frequently intertwines with religion, such beliefs can gain traction during difficult times. This is where a rational leader, able to think critically and manage with clarity, can make a crucial difference between life and death. A notable example is during the earthquake in September 2018 that struck the island of Sulawesi, triggering a tsunami that resulted in significant loss of life and destruction of infrastructure. President Joko Widodo's response was marked by his calm demeanor; he assured the public that his government was actively working on immediate relief for the victims. He also visited the disaster-stricken areas to show support and reassure affected citizens that their needs would be met.

The superstitious idea to sacrifice goats stems from the belief that natural disasters are caused by divine forces, a notion that is untested and unscientific. This belief can be examined, but the results will never be consistent, as it lacks a scientific basis. Regardless of whether the president were to slaughter a thousand goats in response to a natural disaster, the outcome would always be a matter of chance. Natural disasters transpire independently and may cease abruptly, regardless of any sacrificial rituals.

In conclusion, this idea is not scientifically based and cannot stand up to scientific testing. It remains a religious notion or belief and will always remain in that realm.

By reordering your commentary and clarifying transitions between sections, it enhances the logical progression and ensures a more coherent flow of ideas. This way, your insights about the implications of superstition and the role of leadership in crises stand out more effectively.