Now time to plan for your mock triall

• Defense Team

• You believe Friar Lawrence is NOT guilty

You are trying to defend Friar Lawrence from going to jail.

• Prosecutor Team

You believe Friar Lawrence is guilty

You are trying to send Friar Lawrence to jall.

1 Which team are you on? Defense Team of Friar Lawrence or Prosecution of Friar Lawrence?

2. What is your opening statement? (Friar Lawrence is guilty or NOT guilty because..)

8. First reason why Friar Lawrence is guilty or NOT guilty? (with textual evidence and explanation)

4. Second reason why Friar Lawrence is guilty or NOT guilty? (with textual evidence and explanation)

5. Third reason why Friar Lawrence is guilty or NOT guilty? (with textual evidence and explanation)

6. Who are THREE witnesses that you could bring to the stand to help defend your side (defense or prosecution)?

7. Why would you pick those three people? (State reasons for each one)

8. How would their evidence help your case? (State reasons for each piece of evidence they'd provide.)9. How does Romeo's letter, Friar Lawrence's letter, and Friar Lawrence's confession show Friar Lawerence's guilt or innocence?

10. Now think of the OPPOSITE argument of yours. What are three reasons why they would believe that Friar Lawrence is guilty or NOT guilty? (Think of this as the counterclaim in an argument)

11. Now think of three reasons that PROVE your side is RIGHT? (Think of this as your rebuffal)

12. What would your closing statement be? (Remember this is the LAST thing you will say to your Jury to get them to agree with your side)Once you have answered questions 1-12: fill in the following chart with YOUR argument. Opening statement

Introduction:

Good morning, my name is pleasure to and it is my The defendant stands accused of murder. At the conclusion of this case we will ask for a verdict

Summary of Witnesses

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the will call three witnesses to the stand. Our first witness will testify Our second witness will testify Our third witness will testify

Conclusion:

Theme: What is your argument?

Ladies and gentlemen, this case is about

Counterclaim

The Friar Lawrence hopes that their witnesses will prove that However, the testimony will show

At the conclusion of this case, we ask that you find Friar LawrenceThis format is to help you present your case during your mock trial. You will edit this to match which side you are arguing Everything on this planner should be completed with complete sentences and evidence to support your answers**

1 answer

Sure! I will prepare a mock trial defense for Friar Lawrence, arguing that he is NOT guilty.

1. Team Selection

I am on the Defense Team of Friar Lawrence.

2. Opening Statement

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I stand before you today to defend Friar Lawrence, a man of peace and wisdom, who is accused of actions that led to tragic consequences. At the conclusion of this case, we will demonstrate that Friar Lawrence is NOT guilty because his intentions were noble and he acted out of love and hope for the future of Romeo and Juliet.

3. First Reason (NOT guilty)

Friar Lawrence was acting out of a genuine desire to help two young lovers. In Act 2, Scene 6, he expresses his hope that their union will bring peace between their feuding families: “For this alliance may so happy prove, to turn your households' rancor to pure love.” His intentions were to promote harmony, not to cause harm, which shows he is NOT guilty of any malicious wrongdoing.

4. Second Reason (NOT guilty)

Friar Lawrence provided Romeo and Juliet with a secret marriage, which he believed would help resolve the feud between the Montagues and Capulets. In Act 2, Scene 6, he states, “But love, they say, is a planet, and the heavens rejoice to see two lovers united." His actions were motivated by a desire to create a peaceful future, demonstrating that he was NOT guilty because he sought reconciliation, not discord.

5. Third Reason (NOT guilty)

Further, Friar Lawrence was not responsible for the sequence of tragic events following the marriage. His plan to help Juliet escape her impending marriage to Paris reveals his investment in her well-being. In Act 4, Scene 1, he offers a solution: “If, rather than to marry County Paris, thou hast the strength of will to slay thyself, then it is no true fear.” This shows that he was acting in Juliet's best interests, reinforcing that he is NOT guilty.

6. Three Witnesses

  1. Juliet Capulet - as she can testify to her love for Romeo and her own agency in marrying him.
  2. Romeo Montague - as he can express how Friar Lawrence's guidance helped him pursue a noble love.
  3. The Nurse - as a confidante to Juliet, she can share insights into the dynamics between the characters and the context of the actions taken.

7. Rationale for Witness Selection

  • Juliet Capulet: She was the one who sought out Friar Lawrence’s help, showcasing that he acted as a trusted advisor rather than a manipulator.
  • Romeo Montague: Romeo can speak to his intentions with Juliet and the profound impact of the Friar's guidance on their union.
  • The Nurse: Her intimate knowledge of Juliet's emotions allows her to demonstrate that the choices made were not forced upon them, thereby exonerating Friar Lawrence.

8. Evidence Contribution

  • Juliet Capulet: Her testimony will clarify that she willingly chose to marry Romeo and sought Friar Lawrence’s help, thus showing his role was supportive, not culpable.
  • Romeo Montague: He can provide insight into how the Friar's actions positively influenced their relationship, undermining the idea that Lawrence acted negligently.
  • The Nurse: She can testify about the genuine love between Romeo and Juliet and the context behind their secret marriage, indicating that the Friar acted on love and compassion.

9. Letters Analysis

  • Romeo’s letter: This would show that he intended to follow through with his devotion to Juliet, indicating their mutual affection was sincere and not a result of coercion from Friar Lawrence.
  • Friar Lawrence’s letter: It communicates his plans to keep Juliet safe and indicates his intent to help, which further demonstrates his innocence.
  • Friar Lawrence’s confession: His confessions express regret over the tragic events but clarify that his motivations were love and hope, not guilt or wrongdoing.

10. Counterclaims

  1. Friar Lawrence was reckless in marrying Romeo and Juliet without considering the grave consequences.
  2. The secretive nature of the marriage suggests a lack of judgment on his part.
  3. His failure to prevent the subsequent deaths implies negligence.

11. Rebuttal

  1. The world they lived in was inherently dangerous, and love often requires bravery; Friar Lawrence acted as a catalyst for their noble cause.
  2. He advised caution and thoughtfulness throughout; the secrecy was a result of societal pressures, not the Friar’s choices.
  3. He did attempt to rectify the situation after the tragedy occurred, indicating that he was a responsible figure trying to manage an impossible situation.

12. Closing Statement

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this case is not merely about a tragic end but about the intentions and actions that lead us there. Friar Lawrence acted with the best interests of Romeo and Juliet at heart. His guidance came from a place of love and hope for a peaceful future. The evidence clearly shows that he is NOT guilty and not responsible for the chaos that ensued. We urge you to find him innocent and return a verdict based on compassion and understanding for the tragic circumstances surrounding this case.


Chart for Presentation

Opening Statement: Good morning, my name is [Your Name], and it is my pleasure to represent Friar Lawrence. The defendant stands accused of murder. At the conclusion of this case, we will ask for a verdict of NOT guilty.

Summary of Witnesses: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we will call three witnesses to the stand. Our first witness, Juliet Capulet, will testify about her choice to marry Romeo willingly. Our second witness, Romeo Montague, will share how Friar Lawrence's guidance influenced their love. Lastly, our third witness, the Nurse, will provide insight into the dynamics between the lovers and how the Friar’s actions were rooted in love.

Conclusion: Ladies and gentlemen, this case is about intention versus consequence. The Friar Lawrence hopes that their witnesses will prove that he acted in the best interest of the lovers. However, the testimony will show that his motivations were pure and driven by love.

At the conclusion of this case, we ask that you find Friar Lawrence NOT guilty.