Let’s solve each part step-by-step.
A. We start with the bear population in Year 3, which is given as \( 2(x + 10) \). Using the distributive property, we can rewrite this without parentheses:
\[ 2(x + 10) = 2x + 20 \]
So, the bear population in Year 3 can be expressed as \( 2x + 20 \).
B. We know that the total number of bears in the park during Year 2 is 42. The number of bears in Year 2 is given by \( x + 10 \). We can set up the following equation:
\[ x + 10 = 42 \]
Now, we solve for \( x \):
\[ x = 42 - 10 = 32 \]
This means that during Year 1, Roger found that there were \( 32 \) bears in the park.
Explanation: Since Year 2 has \( 10 \) more bears than Year 1, we can verify that if Year 1 had \( 32 \) bears then Year 2 would indeed have \( 32 + 10 = 42 \) bears.
C. The total number of bears in the park during Year 3 is 50. We express the number of bears in Year 3 as \( 2x + 20 \). We can set up the following equation:
\[ 2x + 20 = 50 \]
Now, we solve for \( x \):
- Subtract \( 20 \) from both sides:
\[ 2x = 50 - 20 \ 2x = 30 \]
- Divide both sides by \( 2 \):
\[ x = \frac{30}{2} = 15 \]
Thus, during Year 1, the number of bears was \( 15 \).
Explanation: This difference arises because the population increased differently in Years 2 and 3. Here, if Year 1 had \( 15 \) bears, then Year 2 would have \( 15 + 10 = 25 \) bears, which satisfies the Year 3 calculation of \( 2(25) = 50 \) bears.
D. We need to solve the inequality \( y + 5 > 38 \) to determine possible values for \( y \).
- Subtract \( 5 \) from both sides:
\[ y > 38 - 5 \ y > 33 \]
Now, we can give three possible values for \( y \) that satisfy this inequality. For example:
- \( y = 34 \)
- \( y = 35 \)
- \( y = 40 \)
These values are all greater than \( 33 \).