To reach a conclusion, we first need to interpret the P-value based on the test statistic given, and then we will apply it to the hypotheses stated.
Given:
- Null Hypothesis \( H_0: \mu = 200 \)
- Alternative Hypothesis \( H_1: \mu < 200 \)
- Test Statistic \( z = -0.98 \)
- Significance Level \( \alpha = 0.10 \)
A z-score of -0.98 indicates how many standard deviations the sample mean is below the population mean of 200.
Next, we look up the P-value associated with this z-score. The P-value represents the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as (or more extreme than) the sample statistic, assuming the null hypothesis is true. For a left-tailed test (as indicated by \( H_1 \)), the P-value corresponds to the area to the left of z = -0.98 in the standard normal distribution.
Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, the P-value for \( z = -0.98 \) is approximately 0.1635.
Now, we compare this P-value to our significance level, \( \alpha = 0.10 \):
- Since \( P \text{-value} (0.1635) > \alpha (0.10) \), we fail to reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \).
Final conclusion: There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean weight of the employees is less than 200 lb.
Thus, the correct choice is: B) P-value: 0.1635. Fail to reject H_0. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean is less than 200 pounds.