Question
which is considered a fair use of copyrighted material without specific permission? select the two correct answers
Adaptation of a novel into a screenplay
The use of small excerpts in reviews and critiques
Remixing an artist song
The repeating of small passages in news reporting
The reuse in full for religious and charitable purposes
Adaptation of a novel into a screenplay
The use of small excerpts in reviews and critiques
Remixing an artist song
The repeating of small passages in news reporting
The reuse in full for religious and charitable purposes
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The two correct answers that are generally considered fair use of copyrighted material without specific permission are:
1. **The use of small excerpts in reviews and critiques** - This falls under the category of commentary or criticism, which is commonly recognized as fair use.
2. **The repeating of small passages in news reporting** - This is also typically considered fair use when it is used to report news or provide commentary on current events.
The other options, such as adaptations of novels, remixing songs, and reuse for religious and charitable purposes, may not qualify as fair use and usually require permission from the copyright holder.
1. **The use of small excerpts in reviews and critiques** - This falls under the category of commentary or criticism, which is commonly recognized as fair use.
2. **The repeating of small passages in news reporting** - This is also typically considered fair use when it is used to report news or provide commentary on current events.
The other options, such as adaptations of novels, remixing songs, and reuse for religious and charitable purposes, may not qualify as fair use and usually require permission from the copyright holder.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!