To graph the linear equation \( y = 2x - 3 \), we should first identify a couple of points that lie on this line. We can do this by choosing values for \( x \) and calculating the corresponding \( y \) values.
-
When \( x = 0 \): \[ y = 2(0) - 3 = -3 \] So one point is \( (0, -3) \).
-
When \( x = 1 \): \[ y = 2(1) - 3 = -1 \] So another point is \( (1, -1) \).
-
When \( x = 2 \): \[ y = 2(2) - 3 = 1 \] So a third point is \( (2, 1) \).
Now you can plot these points: \( (0, -3) \), \( (1, -1) \), and \( (2, 1) \). The slope of the line is 2, indicating that for every 1 unit increase in \( x \), \( y \) increases by 2 units.
Looking at the response options provided:
- The first option shows a line that is downward sloping and has points \( (0, -1) \) and \( (1, -3) \) which does not match our equation.
- The second option shows an upward sloping line with points \( (0, 3) \) and \( (1, 5) \), which also does not match.
- The third option shows points \( (1, -1) \) and \( (0, -3) \), but it shows the line going downward.
- The fourth option shows points \( (0, 1) \) and \( (1, 4) \), which does not match either.
The correct graph of the line \( y = 2x - 3 \) should show an upward slope, passing through \( (0, -3) \), \( (1, -1) \), and continuing to rise as \( x \) increases.
None of the options given seem to represent the correct line. If there was a graph showing an upward slope passing through the points (for example, \( (0, -3) \) and \( (2, 1) \)), that would be the correct choice. Since none of the options fit, it's possible there's either an error in the available graphs or a misunderstanding in which points are being displayed.