Question
What differentiated Freeman’s anti-slavery lawsuit from previous anti-slavery lawsuits in Massachusetts?
A
Previous suits argued that slavery violated the state constitution, while Freeman’s suit argued that her enslaver had broken a particular law.
B
Previous suits argued that enslavers had violated specific laws, while Freeman’s suit argued that slavery violated the state constitution.
C
All of the previous suits had failed, while Freeman’s suit was successful.
D
Freeman’s suit failed, while the previous suits were successful.
A
Previous suits argued that slavery violated the state constitution, while Freeman’s suit argued that her enslaver had broken a particular law.
B
Previous suits argued that enslavers had violated specific laws, while Freeman’s suit argued that slavery violated the state constitution.
C
All of the previous suits had failed, while Freeman’s suit was successful.
D
Freeman’s suit failed, while the previous suits were successful.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
A
Previous suits argued that slavery violated the state constitution, while Freeman’s suit argued that her enslaver had broken a particular law.
Previous suits argued that slavery violated the state constitution, while Freeman’s suit argued that her enslaver had broken a particular law.