Question
Which advantage did village societies have over hunter-gatherer societies?
Village societies had metal for tools, but hunter-gatherer societies did not.
Village societies domesticated plants and animals, but hunter-gatherer societies did not.
Village societies could interact with other societies, but hunter-gatherer societies could not.
Village societies used the labor of hunter-gatherers, but hunter-gatherers did not hire villagers.
Village societies had metal for tools, but hunter-gatherer societies did not.
Village societies domesticated plants and animals, but hunter-gatherer societies did not.
Village societies could interact with other societies, but hunter-gatherer societies could not.
Village societies used the labor of hunter-gatherers, but hunter-gatherers did not hire villagers.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The most accurate advantage that village societies had over hunter-gatherer societies is:
**Village societies domesticated plants and animals, but hunter-gatherer societies did not.**
This allowed village societies to have a more stable food supply, leading to population growth, the ability to settle in one place, and the development of more complex social structures. Hunter-gatherer societies, on the other hand, relied on foraging and hunting, which limited their population size and ability to form permanent settlements.
**Village societies domesticated plants and animals, but hunter-gatherer societies did not.**
This allowed village societies to have a more stable food supply, leading to population growth, the ability to settle in one place, and the development of more complex social structures. Hunter-gatherer societies, on the other hand, relied on foraging and hunting, which limited their population size and ability to form permanent settlements.