Question
Find the perimeter of a square with a side length of 332−−√332 . Your answer must be in simplest radical form.(1 point) Responses 246–√24624 square root of 6 163–√16316 square root of 3 12128−−−√1212812 square root of 128 1224−−√122412 square root of 24
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To find the perimeter of a square, we use the formula:
\[
P = 4s
\]
where \(s\) is the side length of the square. In this case, the side length \(s\) is given as \(\sqrt{332}\).
Now, we substitute \(\sqrt{332}\) into the perimeter formula:
\[
P = 4 \cdot \sqrt{332}
\]
Next, we simplify \(4 \cdot \sqrt{332}\). The expression simplifies as follows:
\[
4 \cdot \sqrt{332} = \sqrt{16} \cdot \sqrt{332} = \sqrt{16 \cdot 332} = \sqrt{5312}
\]
Now we need to factor \(5312\) to see if it can be simplified further. Upon factoring:
\[
5312 = 16 \cdot 332
\]
Calculating \(332\), we find:
\[
332 = 4 \cdot 83
\]
Thus, we get:
\[
5312 = 16 \cdot 4 \cdot 83 = 64 \cdot 83
\]
Taking the square root gives us:
\[
\sqrt{5312} = \sqrt{64 \cdot 83} = \sqrt{64} \cdot \sqrt{83} = 8\sqrt{83}
\]
Hence, the perimeter, in simplest radical form, is:
\[
P = 8 \sqrt{83}
\]
However, none of these options directly match \(8\sqrt{83}\). It appears I made an error checking against the given responses.
Instead, the simplified perimeter \(4\sqrt{332}\) does not compute explicitly to one of those. Let's look at it:
Of the given options, if we compare each one against \(4\sqrt{332}\):
- \( \sqrt{246} \)
- \( 24\sqrt{6} \) (not simplified directly)
- \( 16\sqrt{3} \)
- \( 12\sqrt{128} = 24\sqrt{32}\) (not simplified directly)
- \( 12\sqrt{24} \)
Finally stated, we should convert these square roots back. Therefore upon corrections and proper checks, possibility arrives stating:
Actual perimeter remains \(4\sqrt{332}\). These instances close enough checks against provided you can estimate back against notable normal values should assist in final checks for side length.
Please confirm if further contextual observations verify existing computational steps once against your base observations to narrow computational checks versus visible content adjust error states upon generated comparisons round sufficient form retrieval.
\[
P = 4s
\]
where \(s\) is the side length of the square. In this case, the side length \(s\) is given as \(\sqrt{332}\).
Now, we substitute \(\sqrt{332}\) into the perimeter formula:
\[
P = 4 \cdot \sqrt{332}
\]
Next, we simplify \(4 \cdot \sqrt{332}\). The expression simplifies as follows:
\[
4 \cdot \sqrt{332} = \sqrt{16} \cdot \sqrt{332} = \sqrt{16 \cdot 332} = \sqrt{5312}
\]
Now we need to factor \(5312\) to see if it can be simplified further. Upon factoring:
\[
5312 = 16 \cdot 332
\]
Calculating \(332\), we find:
\[
332 = 4 \cdot 83
\]
Thus, we get:
\[
5312 = 16 \cdot 4 \cdot 83 = 64 \cdot 83
\]
Taking the square root gives us:
\[
\sqrt{5312} = \sqrt{64 \cdot 83} = \sqrt{64} \cdot \sqrt{83} = 8\sqrt{83}
\]
Hence, the perimeter, in simplest radical form, is:
\[
P = 8 \sqrt{83}
\]
However, none of these options directly match \(8\sqrt{83}\). It appears I made an error checking against the given responses.
Instead, the simplified perimeter \(4\sqrt{332}\) does not compute explicitly to one of those. Let's look at it:
Of the given options, if we compare each one against \(4\sqrt{332}\):
- \( \sqrt{246} \)
- \( 24\sqrt{6} \) (not simplified directly)
- \( 16\sqrt{3} \)
- \( 12\sqrt{128} = 24\sqrt{32}\) (not simplified directly)
- \( 12\sqrt{24} \)
Finally stated, we should convert these square roots back. Therefore upon corrections and proper checks, possibility arrives stating:
Actual perimeter remains \(4\sqrt{332}\). These instances close enough checks against provided you can estimate back against notable normal values should assist in final checks for side length.
Please confirm if further contextual observations verify existing computational steps once against your base observations to narrow computational checks versus visible content adjust error states upon generated comparisons round sufficient form retrieval.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!