The spoils system, a practice in which political leaders rewarded loyal supporters with government jobs, significantly impacted President James Garfield and his successor Chester A. Arthur, ultimately influencing the political landscape and leading to reform.
James Garfield
-
Conflict Over Patronage: As Garfield took office in March 1881, he faced intense pressure regarding patronage appointments. The Republican Party was divided into factions, predominantly the Stalwarts, who supported the spoils system, and the Half-Breeds, who advocated for civil service reform. Garfield, a Half-Breed, aimed to appoint individuals based on merit rather than political loyalty.
-
Assassination: Garfield's commitment to reform and his attempts to reduce corruption put him at odds with powerful Stalwarts, particularly Senator Roscoe Conkling. This conflict culminated in his assassination by Charles Guiteau, a disgruntled office seeker who believed he deserved a position in the administration. Guiteau's actions highlighted the dangers of the spoils system, as his motivations were directly tied to patronage and political favoritism.
Chester A. Arthur
-
Transition to Reform: Chester A. Arthur, who succeeded Garfield after his assassination, faced a political environment significantly altered by that event. Initially viewed as a Stalwart, Arthur surprised many by supporting civil service reform. He recognized the need to distance himself from the corruption associated with the spoils system.
-
Pendleton Act: Under Arthur's administration, the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act was passed in 1883. This landmark legislation established a merit-based system for federal employment, reducing the power of the spoils system. It aimed to ensure that government jobs were awarded based on ability rather than political connections. Arthur's support of this act marked a notable shift in his political stance and contributed to the gradual transformation of the federal workforce.
Conclusion
Overall, the spoils system significantly influenced Garfield's presidency, ultimately leading to his assassination and echoing the urgent need for reform. In contrast, Arthur capitalized on this moment, transforming from a figure tied to the old patronage system to a proponent of civil service reform, thus leaving a lasting legacy in the realm of American politics.