Question
Amy arranges two water trays with a heat lamp positioned between them. She notes the initial temperature of the water and subsequently activates the heat lamp. After a duration of 20 minutes, Amy records the water temperature once more. The setup and corresponding data are illustrated below.
image c2390572d84b4e56ba4a36017862b059
Which of the following MOST effectively provides an explanation for the outcomes of this experiment?
(1 point)
Responses
Tray 1 accumulated more thermal energy as a result of radiation from the lamp. Given that the lamp emitted more light directed at Tray 1, the radiation from the light effectively heated the water in this tray to a greater extent.
Tray 1 accumulated more thermal energy as a result of radiation from the lamp. Given that the lamp emitted more light directed at Tray 1, the radiation from the light effectively heated the water in this tray to a greater extent.
The water in the trays maintained comparable temperatures due to the absence of convection. Since warm air rises and carries thermal energy with it, the heat generated by the lamp did not effectively reach the water trays.
The water in the trays maintained comparable temperatures due to the absence of convection. Since warm air rises and carries thermal energy with it, the heat generated by the lamp did not effectively reach the water trays.
The water in the trays maintained comparable temperatures due to the influence of convection. Since the trays were positioned equidistant from the lamp, they absorbed a comparable amount of thermal energy.
The water in the trays maintained comparable temperatures due to the influence of convection. Since the trays were positioned equidistant from the lamp, they absorbed a comparable amount of thermal energy.
Tray 1 experienced a greater energy gain through conduction from the lamp. The increased frequency of collisions between light molecules and water molecules in Tray 1 resulted in more effective heating of the water in this tray.
Tray 1 experienced a greater energy gain through conduction from the lamp. The increased frequency of collisions between light molecules and water molecules in Tray 1 resulted in more effective heating of the water in this tray.
Skip to navigation
image c2390572d84b4e56ba4a36017862b059
Which of the following MOST effectively provides an explanation for the outcomes of this experiment?
(1 point)
Responses
Tray 1 accumulated more thermal energy as a result of radiation from the lamp. Given that the lamp emitted more light directed at Tray 1, the radiation from the light effectively heated the water in this tray to a greater extent.
Tray 1 accumulated more thermal energy as a result of radiation from the lamp. Given that the lamp emitted more light directed at Tray 1, the radiation from the light effectively heated the water in this tray to a greater extent.
The water in the trays maintained comparable temperatures due to the absence of convection. Since warm air rises and carries thermal energy with it, the heat generated by the lamp did not effectively reach the water trays.
The water in the trays maintained comparable temperatures due to the absence of convection. Since warm air rises and carries thermal energy with it, the heat generated by the lamp did not effectively reach the water trays.
The water in the trays maintained comparable temperatures due to the influence of convection. Since the trays were positioned equidistant from the lamp, they absorbed a comparable amount of thermal energy.
The water in the trays maintained comparable temperatures due to the influence of convection. Since the trays were positioned equidistant from the lamp, they absorbed a comparable amount of thermal energy.
Tray 1 experienced a greater energy gain through conduction from the lamp. The increased frequency of collisions between light molecules and water molecules in Tray 1 resulted in more effective heating of the water in this tray.
Tray 1 experienced a greater energy gain through conduction from the lamp. The increased frequency of collisions between light molecules and water molecules in Tray 1 resulted in more effective heating of the water in this tray.
Skip to navigation
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The best explanation for the outcomes of the experiment, considering the setup of the heat lamp and how thermal energy is transferred through radiation, is:
**Tray 1 accumulated more thermal energy as a result of radiation from the lamp. Given that the lamp emitted more light directed at Tray 1, the radiation from the light effectively heated the water in this tray to a greater extent.**
This response acknowledges that the heat lamp emits infrared radiation, which directly heats Tray 1 more than Tray 2. In contrast, the other explanations refer to convection or conduction, which are not the primary modes of heat transfer in this specific setup where a heat lamp is used.
**Tray 1 accumulated more thermal energy as a result of radiation from the lamp. Given that the lamp emitted more light directed at Tray 1, the radiation from the light effectively heated the water in this tray to a greater extent.**
This response acknowledges that the heat lamp emits infrared radiation, which directly heats Tray 1 more than Tray 2. In contrast, the other explanations refer to convection or conduction, which are not the primary modes of heat transfer in this specific setup where a heat lamp is used.