Question
Which expression is equivalent to (jk)l?
(j + k) + l
j(kl)
(2jk)l
(j + k)l
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which expression is equivalent to \((jk)l\), let's analyze each provided option:
1. **\((j + k) + l\)**: This expression does not have any products that combine \(j\), \(k\), and \(l\) in the same way as \((jk)l\). Thus, it is not equivalent.
2. **\(j(kl)\)**: This expression can be rewritten using the associative property of multiplication as \((jk)l\). Thus, this is equivalent.
3. **\((2jk)l\)**: This expression introduces an additional coefficient of \(2\), so it is not equivalent to \((jk)l\).
4. **\((j + k)l\)**: This expression also does not represent the multiplication of \(j\) and \(k\) before multiplying by \(l\), so it is not equivalent.
Therefore, the expression that is equivalent to \((jk)l\) is:
\[
\boxed{j(kl)}
\]
1. **\((j + k) + l\)**: This expression does not have any products that combine \(j\), \(k\), and \(l\) in the same way as \((jk)l\). Thus, it is not equivalent.
2. **\(j(kl)\)**: This expression can be rewritten using the associative property of multiplication as \((jk)l\). Thus, this is equivalent.
3. **\((2jk)l\)**: This expression introduces an additional coefficient of \(2\), so it is not equivalent to \((jk)l\).
4. **\((j + k)l\)**: This expression also does not represent the multiplication of \(j\) and \(k\) before multiplying by \(l\), so it is not equivalent.
Therefore, the expression that is equivalent to \((jk)l\) is:
\[
\boxed{j(kl)}
\]
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!