Compare two claims above. How do these claims differ from one another?

Question

A. Claim 1 takes an affirmative position toward genetically modified foods, while Claim 2 takes a negative position. B. Claim 1 establishes an informal, conversational style through the use of contractions and point of view. C. Claim 1 relies solely on anecdotal evidence, while Claim 2 uses a wider range of supporting evidence. D. Claim 1 establishes a formal, academic style through the use of complex syntax and advanced vocabulary.
Passage:
• Claim 1: If you have ever eaten anything that has grown in the ground, you've almost certainly eaten genetically modified organisms. Genetic engineering has been integral to the human diet for thousands of years, and it's given us a wider and better variety of foods. Adapting this technology on a wider scale will allow that very positive trend to continue.

• Claim 2: Over 2,000 scientific studies performed worldwide have shown that genetically modified crops are safe and that they have the potential to enrich the human diet nutritionally, lower the price of food, and end food insecurity in a world where the growing population continues to place a strain on resources.

Answer 1

The two claims differ in their approaches and types of evidence used to support their arguments regarding genetically modified foods. Here is a breakdown of the differences based on the options provided:

A. Claim 1 takes an affirmative position toward genetically modified foods, while Claim 2 takes a negative position.

• Incorrect: Both claims take an affirmative position toward genetically modified foods; Claim 1 emphasizes the historical benefits, while Claim 2 cites scientific studies supporting their safety and potential benefits.

B. Claim 1 establishes an informal, conversational style through the use of contractions and point of view.

• Incorrect: While Claim 1 adopts a more conversational tone, this option does not compare the two claims effectively.

C. Claim 1 relies solely on anecdotal evidence, while Claim 2 uses a wider range of supporting evidence.

• Correct: Claim 1 relies on a generalized, anecdotal perspective about the historical acceptance of genetically modified organisms in human diets. In contrast, Claim 2 cites specific scientific studies as evidence.

D. Claim 1 establishes a formal, academic style through the use of complex syntax and advanced vocabulary.

• Incorrect: Claim 1 does not exhibit a formal academic style. Instead, it is more casual and personal, whereas Claim 2 adopts a more formal, evidence-based academic style.

The best answer that highlights the main difference between the two claims is C, as it accurately represents the variance in the type of evidence and support utilized in each claim.