To analyze the data in the table, let's break it down based on the information provided.
-
For Parents with Kids Under 10:
- Non-Season Pass Holders: 52
- Season Pass Holders: 125
- Total: 177
-
For Parents with Kids from 10–18:
- Non-Season Pass Holders: 50
- Season Pass Holders: 58
- Total: 108
From the data, we can see:
- The number of season pass holders with kids under 10 (125) is significantly higher than those with kids from 10–18 (58).
- Conversely, the number of non-season pass holders is almost the same in both categories (52 under 10 vs. 50 from 10–18).
Now, let's evaluate the statements:
-
The majority of non-season pass holders have children under 10.
- Total non-season pass holders: 102
- Non-season pass holders with kids under 10: 52
- Non-season pass holders with kids from 10–18: 50
- This statement is not true because the numbers are very close.
-
There is an association between the ages of children and whether a parent is a season pass holder.
- There is a clear difference between the two age groups in terms of season pass holders: a high number of season pass holders have kids under 10 compared to kids from 10–18. This suggests an association.
-
There is no association between the age of children and whether a parent is a season pass holder.
- This statement is incorrect based on the differences observed in the data.
-
The older the children, the more likely it is that a parent has a season pass.
- This statement is incorrect. The data shows that parents with younger children (under 10) are more likely to be season pass holders.
Based on the analysis, the correct statement is:
There is an association between the ages of children and whether a parent is a season pass holder.