To interpret the data from the relative frequency table correctly, let's look at the joint relative frequencies for each group:
- Third graders with a pet: 16%
- Third graders without a pet: 19%
- Fourth graders with a pet: 29%
- Fourth graders without a pet: 36%
Now let's analyze the given statements:
-
The smallest joint relative frequency is third graders without a pet.
- This is incorrect. The smallest joint relative frequency is for third graders with a pet (16%).
-
More fourth graders responded than third graders.
- This is correct. Fourth graders account for 65% and third graders for 35%, indicating more fourth graders responded.
-
Most students in the sample have a pet.
- This is incorrect. Only 45% have a pet, while 55% do not.
-
The largest joint relative frequency is fourth graders with a pet.
- This is correct, but the largest joint relative frequency among all options is fourth graders without a pet (36%).
The most accurate interpretation of the data based on the provided options is:
More fourth graders responded than third graders.