Question

how does the organization of evidence impact the strength of an argument
a) evidence creates logical connections between claims and reasoning
b) evidence contradicts the main argument
c) evidence randomly supports unrelated claims
d) evidence repeats the same point multiple times

Answer 1

The organization of evidence significantly impacts the strength of an argument in various ways. Among the options provided, the most relevant is:

**a) evidence creates logical connections between claims and reasoning.**

When evidence is well-organized and logically connected to the claims being made, it enhances the credibility of the argument and helps persuade the audience. Organized evidence demonstrates a clear line of reasoning, making it easier for readers or listeners to follow and understand the argument's validity.

The other options would likely weaken an argument:

- **b) evidence contradicts the main argument** would undermine the argument's credibility.
- **c) evidence randomly supports unrelated claims** would create confusion and lack coherence.
- **d) evidence repeats the same point multiple times** can lead to redundancy without adding new strength to the argument.

In summary, well-organized evidence that logically supports claims significantly strengthens an argument.