To determine which table shows that \( g(x) = -f(-x) \) results in a reflection about the origin of the function graphed, let's break down what \( g(x) \) represents in terms of the original function \( f(x) \).
-
Calculate \( -f(-x) \):
- For any point \( (x, f(x)) \), when we substitute \(-x\), we get \( f(-x) \).
- Applying the negative sign gives us \( -f(-x) \).
- A reflection about the origin transforms the point \( (x, f(x)) \) into \( (-x, -f(x)) \).
-
Therefore, for each point \( (x, f(x)) \) in the original function, the point \( g(x) = -f(-x) \) will correspond to \( (-x, -f(x)) \).
-
For a specific example, if we have points from the graph of \( f(x) \):
- Say, if \( f(1) = 2 \), then the reflected point would be \( g(-1) = -f(-1) \). If \( f(-1) = -2 \), then \( g(-1) = 2 \).
We need to verify each response against these transformations:
-
Option 1 (g(x) table):
x g(x) 1 -2 2 0 3 -2
Corresponds to \( (1, -2), (2, 0), (3, -2) \). If we assume \( f(1)=2 \), \( f(2)=0 \), and \( f(3)=2 \), we see that it does not reflect points about the origin correctly.
-
Option 2 (g(x) table):
x g(x) -1 -2 -2 0 -3 -2
Corresponds to \( (-1, -2), (-2, 0), (-3, -2) \). Again, this does not correctly correspond to the origin reflection.
-
Option 3 (g(x) table):
x g(x) -1 2 -2 0 -3 2
This corresponds to \( (-1, 2), (-2, 0), (-3, 2) \) which can be verified if we take their original counterparts \( (1, -2), (2, 0), (3, -2) \) and reflect.
-
Option 4 (g(x) table):
x g(x) 1 2 2 0 3 2
This corresponds to points reflecting up, which doesn't show a reflection about the origin.
Upon reviewing these options, Option 3 is the correct one, as it reflects the points about the origin correctly based on the transformations given.
Therefore, the correct response is Option 3:
x g(x)
-1 2
-2 0
-3 2