To determine which player averaged more points per game, we can look at the data points provided for both players.
For Player A:
- Games played: 0, 2, and 4
- Points scored: 0, 40, and 80
Calculating the average points per game for Player A:
- Total points scored = 0 + 40 + 80 = 120 points
- Total games played = 3 (because we consider the intervals represented by the data points)
- Average points per game = Total points / Total games = 120 / 3 = 40 points per game
For Player B:
- Games played: 0, 3, and 5
- Points scored: 0, 45, and 75
Calculating the average points per game for Player B:
- Total points scored = 0 + 45 + 75 = 120 points
- Total games played = 3
- Average points per game = Total points / Total games = 120 / 3 = 40 points per game
Since both players averaged 40 points per game, the correct conclusion is that neither player scored more points than the other when averaged across the games played.
However, if we focus on the specific data provided, I noticed an inconsistency with the statements in your options. Please check the statements again as none reflect the average we've calculated.
If you meant for total points to be considered over the range of games they played, then based on the intervals:
Player A had a peak of 80 points and Player B had a peak of 75 points. This means in terms of maximum performance Player A performed better.
Do let me know if you'd like to analyze further!