Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Translate the figure HIJKL 3 units to the left. Which of the following would be a vertex in the translated figure? (1 point) Re...Asked by IT"SME
Translate the figure HIJKL 3 units to the left. Which of the following would be a vertex in the translated figure? (1 point) Responses (−1, −2) left parenthesis negative 1 comma negative 2 right parenthesis (−6, 6) left parenthesis negative 6 comma 6 right parenthesis (2, 4) left parenthesis 2 comma 4 right parenthesis (−7, 4) left parenthesis negative 7 comma 4 right parenthesis
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To translate a figure 3 units to the left, you subtract 3 from the x-coordinate of each vertex of the figure.
Let’s consider the options given:
1. \( (-1, -2) \)
2. \( (-6, 6) \)
3. \( (2, 4) \)
4. \( (-7, 4) \)
Now, we need to check if these points could be the result of translating some original point 3 units to the left:
- If we take \( (-1, -2) \), then it could originate from \( (2, -2) \) (2 - 3 = -1).
- If we take \( (-6, 6) \), then it could originate from \( (-3, 6) \) (-3 - 3 = -6).
- If we take \( (2, 4) \), then it could originate from \( (5, 4) \) (5 - 3 = 2).
- If we take \( (-7, 4) \), then it could originate from \( (-4, 4) \) (-4 - 3 = -7).
Since we are looking for vertices that could be part of the translated figure after moving 3 units to the left, we find that **any of these points could possibly represent a vertex in the translated figure** depending on their original coordinates.
However, if the question is asking for a specific vertex that is guaranteed to exist in the translated figure considering the original position of the figure is not given, we cannot definitively determine which option is a vertex of the translated figure. We only conclude that after translating the figure 3 units to the left, any coordinates could feasibly be results of a shift, but without knowing the original coordinates of vertices HIJKL, we can’t specifically answer which vertex would appear.
Please provide additional information or context for accuracy.
Let’s consider the options given:
1. \( (-1, -2) \)
2. \( (-6, 6) \)
3. \( (2, 4) \)
4. \( (-7, 4) \)
Now, we need to check if these points could be the result of translating some original point 3 units to the left:
- If we take \( (-1, -2) \), then it could originate from \( (2, -2) \) (2 - 3 = -1).
- If we take \( (-6, 6) \), then it could originate from \( (-3, 6) \) (-3 - 3 = -6).
- If we take \( (2, 4) \), then it could originate from \( (5, 4) \) (5 - 3 = 2).
- If we take \( (-7, 4) \), then it could originate from \( (-4, 4) \) (-4 - 3 = -7).
Since we are looking for vertices that could be part of the translated figure after moving 3 units to the left, we find that **any of these points could possibly represent a vertex in the translated figure** depending on their original coordinates.
However, if the question is asking for a specific vertex that is guaranteed to exist in the translated figure considering the original position of the figure is not given, we cannot definitively determine which option is a vertex of the translated figure. We only conclude that after translating the figure 3 units to the left, any coordinates could feasibly be results of a shift, but without knowing the original coordinates of vertices HIJKL, we can’t specifically answer which vertex would appear.
Please provide additional information or context for accuracy.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.