Question
What are two types of evidence writers should use to support their claims?
What are claims that make the opposite point the writer is trying to make?
What is a rebuttal?
Practice:
Using this article from the American Psychiatric Association,
What evidence from the article would support the claim that there is something special about the bond between humans and animals?
Answer:
In your own words, what would be a fair counterclaim to the claim that pets are part of the family?
Answer:
What evidence from the article would refute (prove wrong) the counterclaim that people do not consider pets as a part of the family?
Answer:
What are claims that make the opposite point the writer is trying to make?
What is a rebuttal?
Practice:
Using this article from the American Psychiatric Association,
What evidence from the article would support the claim that there is something special about the bond between humans and animals?
Answer:
In your own words, what would be a fair counterclaim to the claim that pets are part of the family?
Answer:
What evidence from the article would refute (prove wrong) the counterclaim that people do not consider pets as a part of the family?
Answer:
Answers
GPT-4o mini
### Two Types of Evidence Writers Should Use to Support Their Claims:
1. **Statistical Evidence** - This includes data that can be quantified, such as survey results, studies, or experiments that provide numerical support for a claim.
2. **Anecdotal Evidence** - This consists of personal stories or examples that illustrate a point and can resonate emotionally with the reader, even though they may not be representative of the larger population.
### Claims that Make the Opposite Point the Writer is Trying to Make:
1. "Pets do not significantly improve human wellbeing."
2. "The emotional connection people feel towards their pets is overstated and lacks scientific backing."
### What is a Rebuttal?
A rebuttal is a response or argument against an opposing viewpoint. It aims to disprove or counter the claims made by the other side, often by providing evidence that supports the original claim and challenges the validity of the counterclaims.
### Practice:
**Using the Article from the American Psychiatric Association**
**What evidence from the article would support the claim that there is something special about the bond between humans and animals?**
Answer: The article may highlight studies showing that interactions with pets can reduce stress and anxiety in humans, as well as evidence that such bonds can lead to increased feelings of happiness and companionship, illustrating the emotional and psychological benefits of human-animal relationships.
**In your own words, what would be a fair counterclaim to the claim that pets are part of the family?**
Answer: Some may argue that while pets provide companionship, they are ultimately animals and do not possess the same familial bonds or responsibilities that human family members have. This viewpoint suggests that the relationships humans have with their pets may be more transactional or based on convenience rather than true familial ties.
**What evidence from the article would refute (prove wrong) the counterclaim that people do not consider pets as a part of the family?**
Answer: The article could provide findings from surveys that show a significant percentage of pet owners refer to their pets as family members and care for them in ways that reflect familial responsibilities, such as providing healthcare, including them in family activities, and experiencing grief similar to that felt for human family members when they lose a pet.
1. **Statistical Evidence** - This includes data that can be quantified, such as survey results, studies, or experiments that provide numerical support for a claim.
2. **Anecdotal Evidence** - This consists of personal stories or examples that illustrate a point and can resonate emotionally with the reader, even though they may not be representative of the larger population.
### Claims that Make the Opposite Point the Writer is Trying to Make:
1. "Pets do not significantly improve human wellbeing."
2. "The emotional connection people feel towards their pets is overstated and lacks scientific backing."
### What is a Rebuttal?
A rebuttal is a response or argument against an opposing viewpoint. It aims to disprove or counter the claims made by the other side, often by providing evidence that supports the original claim and challenges the validity of the counterclaims.
### Practice:
**Using the Article from the American Psychiatric Association**
**What evidence from the article would support the claim that there is something special about the bond between humans and animals?**
Answer: The article may highlight studies showing that interactions with pets can reduce stress and anxiety in humans, as well as evidence that such bonds can lead to increased feelings of happiness and companionship, illustrating the emotional and psychological benefits of human-animal relationships.
**In your own words, what would be a fair counterclaim to the claim that pets are part of the family?**
Answer: Some may argue that while pets provide companionship, they are ultimately animals and do not possess the same familial bonds or responsibilities that human family members have. This viewpoint suggests that the relationships humans have with their pets may be more transactional or based on convenience rather than true familial ties.
**What evidence from the article would refute (prove wrong) the counterclaim that people do not consider pets as a part of the family?**
Answer: The article could provide findings from surveys that show a significant percentage of pet owners refer to their pets as family members and care for them in ways that reflect familial responsibilities, such as providing healthcare, including them in family activities, and experiencing grief similar to that felt for human family members when they lose a pet.