The debate over whether animals should be cloned encompasses both notable benefits and considerable risks. Proponents of animal cloning, as highlighted in Samuel Viler’s article, argue that cloning endangered species, such as the woolly mammoth, could help combat biodiversity loss and mitigate the effects of climate change. By reviving these species, we could potentially restore ecological balance and enhance our understanding of past ecosystems. On the other hand, Phillip Jones emphasizes the ethical and health concerns surrounding cloning, noting the high failure rates and the risk of introducing genetic defects in cloned animals, which may lead to unnecessary suffering.
Despite these risks, the potential advantages of cloning cannot be overlooked. While concerns regarding health and ethics are valid, they can be addressed through stringent regulations and advancements in cloning technology that improve success rates and animal welfare. If managed responsibly, the cloning of certain animals could play a crucial role in conservation efforts and scientific research. Therefore, a careful approach to animal cloning—as opposed to a blanket rejection—might offer a path forward that balances innovation with ethical considerations.