Question
Which of the following charts best compares the goals of “big stick” diplomacy and dollar diplomacy?(1 point)
Responses
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military intervention/force
Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish U.S. military power
Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduced use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military
Establish financial stability
Reduced use of military intervention
Expand U.S. economic interests
End conflict by paying off aggressors
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military Establish financial stability Reduced use of military intervention Expand U.S. economic interests End conflict by paying off aggressors Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict non-peacefully
Expand U.S. economic interests
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
End conflict with military
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce US control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict non-peacefully Expand U.S. economic interests Reduced use of military intervention Establish financial stability End conflict with military Establish U.S. military power Reinforce US control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict peacefully
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduce use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
Expand U.S. economic interests
Responses
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military intervention/force
Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish U.S. military power
Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduced use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military
Establish financial stability
Reduced use of military intervention
Expand U.S. economic interests
End conflict by paying off aggressors
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military Establish financial stability Reduced use of military intervention Expand U.S. economic interests End conflict by paying off aggressors Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict non-peacefully
Expand U.S. economic interests
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
End conflict with military
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce US control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict non-peacefully Expand U.S. economic interests Reduced use of military intervention Establish financial stability End conflict with military Establish U.S. military power Reinforce US control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict peacefully
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduce use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
Expand U.S. economic interests
Answers
GPT-4o mini
To best compare the goals of "Big Stick" diplomacy and dollar diplomacy, it's important to understand the primary objectives of each approach:
1. **Big Stick Diplomacy** (associated with Theodore Roosevelt) emphasizes military strength and readiness to use it if necessary to achieve foreign policy goals, particularly in Latin America. It focuses on:
- Ending conflicts, often through military intervention.
- Establishing U.S. military power.
- Reinforcing U.S. control over Latin America.
2. **Dollar Diplomacy** (associated with William Howard Taft) focuses on economic interests and financial investments as tools for foreign policy. It emphasizes:
- Financial stability and promoting American economic interests abroad.
- Reducing the need for military intervention by resolving issues through financial means.
- Encouraging U.S. economic dominance rather than military dominance.
Given this understanding, the most suitable chart for comparing the two policies would highlight the contrast in their approaches: one emphasizing military intervention and the other emphasizing economic influence.
### Appropriate Chart Choice:
Based on the descriptions, the following chart offers a balanced comparison:
**“Big Stick” Diplomacy** | **Dollar Diplomacy**
--- | ---
End conflict with military intervention/force | Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America | Expand U.S. economic interests
Establish U.S. military power | Reduce use of military intervention
End conflict peacefully | End conflict by paying off aggressors
This chart presents clear distinctions between the two policies, focusing on "Big Stick" diplomacy's reliance on military power versus "Dollar Diplomacy's" emphasis on financial and economic strategies.
1. **Big Stick Diplomacy** (associated with Theodore Roosevelt) emphasizes military strength and readiness to use it if necessary to achieve foreign policy goals, particularly in Latin America. It focuses on:
- Ending conflicts, often through military intervention.
- Establishing U.S. military power.
- Reinforcing U.S. control over Latin America.
2. **Dollar Diplomacy** (associated with William Howard Taft) focuses on economic interests and financial investments as tools for foreign policy. It emphasizes:
- Financial stability and promoting American economic interests abroad.
- Reducing the need for military intervention by resolving issues through financial means.
- Encouraging U.S. economic dominance rather than military dominance.
Given this understanding, the most suitable chart for comparing the two policies would highlight the contrast in their approaches: one emphasizing military intervention and the other emphasizing economic influence.
### Appropriate Chart Choice:
Based on the descriptions, the following chart offers a balanced comparison:
**“Big Stick” Diplomacy** | **Dollar Diplomacy**
--- | ---
End conflict with military intervention/force | Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America | Expand U.S. economic interests
Establish U.S. military power | Reduce use of military intervention
End conflict peacefully | End conflict by paying off aggressors
This chart presents clear distinctions between the two policies, focusing on "Big Stick" diplomacy's reliance on military power versus "Dollar Diplomacy's" emphasis on financial and economic strategies.