Why do historians disagree about whether uniting Germany was a good thing? (1 point)

Responses

Uniting Germany for the first time was a big achievement. Everyone in Germany spoke German, so they weren’t affected.
Uniting Germany for the first time was a big achievement. Everyone in Germany spoke German, so they weren’t affected.

Uniting Germany had been done before, so it was not a big achievement. Everyone in Germany spoke German, so they weren’t affected.
Uniting Germany had been done before, so it was not a big achievement. Everyone in Germany spoke German, so they weren’t affected.

Uniting Germany for the first time was a big achievement. But life became more difficult for those who did not speak or feel German.
Uniting Germany for the first time was a big achievement. But life became more difficult for those who did not speak or feel German.

Historians do not disagree about whether uniting Germany was a good thing.

1 answer

Uniting Germany for the first time was a big achievement. But life became more difficult for those who did not speak or feel German.

This response highlights the complexity of the issue, acknowledging both the sense of accomplishment in unification and the challenges faced by minority groups or regions that may not have identified as German, thus reflecting the differing perspectives among historians.

Similar Questions
  1. Why do historians disagree about whether uniting Germany was a good thing?Historians do not disagree whether uniting Germany was
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Why do historians disagree about whether uniting Germany was a good thing?-Historians do not disagree about whether uniting
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Draw a conclusion about the role of war in uniting Germany.(1 point)Responses The Franco-Prussian War convinced Otto von
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. Draw a conclusion about the role of war in uniting Germany.(1 point)Responses The Franco-Prussian War convinced Otto von
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions