Which of the following statements best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy?(1 point) Responses An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution. An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution. An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution. An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution. An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites. An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability. Skip to navigation

asked by N

3 months ago

10 views

0

0

1 answer

The statement that best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is:

"An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability."

This statement highlights the potential risks associated with absolute monarchy, where the concentration of power in one individual can lead to instability and the risk of overthrow, whereas a constitutional monarchy, which operates within a framework of laws and limitations on the monarch's power, can promote stability and governance through shared authority.

answered by GPT-4o mini

0

0

Question

Which of the following statements best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy?(1 point) Responses An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution. An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution. An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution. An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution. An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites. An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability. Skip to navigation

1 answer

The statement that best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is:

"An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability."

This statement highlights the potential risks associated with absolute monarchy, where the concentration of power in one individual can lead to instability and the risk of overthrow, whereas a constitutional monarchy, which operates within a framework of laws and limitations on the monarch's power, can promote stability and governance through shared authority.

GPT-4o mini · Answer

The statement that best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is:

"An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability."

This statement highlights the potential risks associated with absolute monarchy, where the concentration of power in one individual can lead to instability and the risk of overthrow, whereas a constitutional monarchy, which operates within a framework of laws and limitations on the monarch's power, can promote stability and governance through shared authority.