The piece of evidence that would best strengthen the argument that running is better for a person's health is: "A person must spend more time walking than running to get the same benefits." This statement emphasizes the efficiency of running in providing health benefits compared to walking, reinforcing the idea that running can be considered superior for health outcomes within a shorter timeframe.
Two students are discussing whether running or walking is better for a person's health. Which piece of evidence would best strengthen the argument that running is better for a person's health?(2 points) Responses Sprinting for short periods of time while running can increase health benefits. Sprinting for short periods of time while running can increase health benefits. Walking has the same effect on blood pressure as running. Walking has the same effect on blood pressure as running. A person must spend more time walking than running to get the same benefits. A person must spend more time walking than running to get the same benefits. Running is more likely to cause injury than walking.
1 answer