In the interaction between Okeke and Nnameka, Okeke employs a confrontational approach to persuade his son to accept his viewpoint on marriage. His refusal to entertain Nnameka's perspective reflects his unwavering belief in traditional values, as he dismisses the idea that modern views on marriage hold any validity. By stating "nothing is different," Okeke seeks to assert his authority and reinforce the idea that his experience and understanding of marital norms are superior. However, this approach ultimately fails to persuade Nnameka, who is gradually asserting his independence and questioning the rigidity of his father's beliefs. Instead of fostering a dialogue, Okeke's stubbornness creates a rift, showing that his insistence on tradition may alienate rather than convince his son.
when Okeke interrupts Nnameka the reader identifies that he refuse to listen to a reason when Nnameka attempts to tell him marriage is different he refutes it and claims “nothing is different” reasserting his stubborn nature.
how is okeke persuading nnameka and is it sucessfull or did it fail? write a parapgraph
1 answer