when Okeke interrupts Nnameka the reader identifies that he refuse to listen to a reason when Nnameka attempts to tell him marriage is different he refutes it and claims “nothing is different” reasserting his stubborn nature.

how is okeke persuading nnameka and is it sucessfull or did it fail?

1 answer

In the context of the narrative involving Okeke and Nnameka, Okeke's refusal to listen to Nnameka's reasoning about the nature of marriage reflects his rigid mindset and adherence to traditional values. Okeke's perspective is deeply rooted in his cultural beliefs, which prioritize arranged marriages and the authority of parental choice over individual desires and modern concepts of love and independence.

When Okeke asserts that "nothing is different," he is attempting to persuade Nnameka by emphasizing the unchanging nature of their cultural and familial obligations. He argues from a position of authority that comes from his role as a father and a representative of the older generation. His approach is based on the idea that respect for tradition and familial duty should take precedence over personal feelings or societal changes.

Despite Okeke's efforts to assert his authority and convince Nnameka, his persuasion ultimately fails. Nnameka is determined to follow his own path, which diverges from his father's expectations. By rejecting Okeke’s insistence on tradition, Nnameka asserts his independence and challenges the very foundations of his father's beliefs. This generational conflict highlights the struggle between traditional values and the desire for personal autonomy, illustrating that Okeke's attempts at persuasion do not resonate with his son.

In summary, while Okeke tries to persuade Nnameka by invoking traditional values and asserting that nothing has changed about marriage, his efforts fail. Nnameka's willingness to pursue his own understanding of love and marriage signals a shift in values that Okeke is unable to comprehend, ultimately leading to a breakdown in their communication and relationship.