Question
Which piece of evidence could be used to argue AGAINST a ban on plastic bags?(1 point)
Responses
Plastic breaks down and is ingested by sea creatures and negatively impacts their health.
Plastic breaks down and is ingested by sea creatures and negatively impacts their health.
It takes 1000 years for a plastic bag to degrade in a landfill.
It takes 1000 years for a plastic bag to degrade in a landfill.
Paper bags take about 400% more energy to produce.
Paper bags take about 400% more energy to produce.
More than 87% of plastic bags are not recycled.
Responses
Plastic breaks down and is ingested by sea creatures and negatively impacts their health.
Plastic breaks down and is ingested by sea creatures and negatively impacts their health.
It takes 1000 years for a plastic bag to degrade in a landfill.
It takes 1000 years for a plastic bag to degrade in a landfill.
Paper bags take about 400% more energy to produce.
Paper bags take about 400% more energy to produce.
More than 87% of plastic bags are not recycled.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The piece of evidence that could be used to argue AGAINST a ban on plastic bags is:
**Paper bags take about 400% more energy to produce.**
This argument suggests that banning plastic bags in favor of paper bags may have a larger environmental impact due to the higher energy consumption associated with paper bag production.
**Paper bags take about 400% more energy to produce.**
This argument suggests that banning plastic bags in favor of paper bags may have a larger environmental impact due to the higher energy consumption associated with paper bag production.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!