Question
Question
Use the table of information from an investigation to answer the question.
Student Depth of Object in Sand (cm)
Maddie 1.8
Naveed 4.0
Two students drop an object into sand from a height of 1.5 meters. They record the depth of the hole made in the sand by each student’s object. What is the most likely explanation for the results?
(1 point)
Responses
Maddie’s object has a smaller width.
Maddie’s object has a smaller width.
Maddie’s object had a faster drop speed.
Maddie’s object had a faster drop speed.
Naveed’s object had greater kinetic energy.
Naveed’s object had greater kinetic energy.
Naveed’s object has less mass.
Use the table of information from an investigation to answer the question.
Student Depth of Object in Sand (cm)
Maddie 1.8
Naveed 4.0
Two students drop an object into sand from a height of 1.5 meters. They record the depth of the hole made in the sand by each student’s object. What is the most likely explanation for the results?
(1 point)
Responses
Maddie’s object has a smaller width.
Maddie’s object has a smaller width.
Maddie’s object had a faster drop speed.
Maddie’s object had a faster drop speed.
Naveed’s object had greater kinetic energy.
Naveed’s object had greater kinetic energy.
Naveed’s object has less mass.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The most likely explanation for the results, given that Naveed’s object caused a deeper hole in the sand (4.0 cm) compared to Maddie’s object (1.8 cm), would be that:
**Naveed’s object had greater kinetic energy.**
This is because a greater kinetic energy upon impact would likely result from a larger mass or a greater drop speed, leading to a deeper penetration in the sand.
**Naveed’s object had greater kinetic energy.**
This is because a greater kinetic energy upon impact would likely result from a larger mass or a greater drop speed, leading to a deeper penetration in the sand.