The change that is an unlikely result of the destruction of wetlands is healthy fish populations. Wetlands serve as critical habitats for various aquatic species, including fish. Their destruction typically leads to negative impacts such as declines in plant and animal populations, increased frequency of floods, and pollution of nearby streams, making healthy fish populations unlikely.
Which change is an unlikely result of destruction of wetlands?
Responses
decline in plant and animal populations
decline in plant and animal populations
healthy fish populations
healthy fish populations
increased frequency of floods
increased frequency of floods
pollution of nearby streams
1 answer