Schools should run throughout the year with several short breaks instead of closing for the summer.

Is each piece of evidence relevant or not relevant to the argument?

Relevant Not Relevant Options: Students lose some of their learning when they have a long summer break. Many students prefer to learn by doing projects instead of by reading books. Year-round school allows facilities to avoid overcrowding because student groups can be staggered. Many schools offer programming before and after school to supplement learning.

1 answer

Let's evaluate each piece of evidence in relation to the argument that schools should run year-round with several short breaks instead of closing for the summer.

  1. Students lose some of their learning when they have a long summer break.

    • Relevant: This supports the argument by highlighting a downside of traditional summer breaks, emphasizing the benefits of a year-round schooling model.
  2. Many students prefer to learn by doing projects instead of by reading books.

    • Not Relevant: While this is a valid point about student learning preferences, it does not directly support the argument for year-round schooling.
  3. Year-round school allows facilities to avoid overcrowding because student groups can be staggered.

    • Relevant: This provides a practical benefit of year-round schooling, linking it directly to the argument by addressing operational efficiency.
  4. Many schools offer programming before and after school to supplement learning.

    • Not Relevant: This statement refers to existing educational practices and does not support the case for transitioning to a year-round school model.

In summary:

  1. Relevant
  2. Not Relevant
  3. Relevant
  4. Not Relevant