Thesis statement:
To preserve the heritage of people who speak different languages and thecultural knowledge these languages impart, we must recognize their value and make targetedefforts to ensure their survival.
We should support these ambitious initiatives with our donations and volunteer time. Theyare practical and proven ways of reviving languages without federal assistance and withoutthe goal of implementing the languages on a wide scale. The goal of preserving languagesis apolitical; it is simply a way to preserve cultural history. “When humanity loses a language,we also lose the potential for greater diversity in art, music, literature and oral traditions,”said Bögre Udell of Wikitongues. Language is a living object worthy of survival. Alllanguages must be valued enough to be kept alive.
Why is this an effective conclusion to the author’s argument? Select the two correct answers.
(1 point)
It includes a clear call to action.
It avoids making appeals to ethos.
It reframes the thesis statement.
It acknowledges counterclaims.
It introduces new pieces of evidence.
1 answer
The two correct answers are:
It includes a clear call to action. - The conclusion encourages support for initiatives to preserve languages through donations and volunteer work, motivating readers to take action.
It reframes the thesis statement. - The conclusion reiterates the importance of preserving languages and their cultural significance, reinforcing the main argument presented in the thesis.
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer