Asked by Jennifer
1.Why is personal jurisdiction an issue for those who post Websites?
2.What are some reasons that a website owner might be concerned with whether a court is able to obtain 'personal jurisdiction' over them?
3.What is normally required for a court to have personal jurisdiction?
4.When is a Court required to use long-arm jurisdiction?
5.Why is long arm jurisdiction an issue for those who create or post Web pages?
6.According to the Wolf article, the courts have imposed an "interactive-passive" test of jurisdiction. Explain that distinction.
7.According to the Wolf article, is advertising on the Web alone enough to confer personal jurisdiction?
2.What are some reasons that a website owner might be concerned with whether a court is able to obtain 'personal jurisdiction' over them?
3.What is normally required for a court to have personal jurisdiction?
4.When is a Court required to use long-arm jurisdiction?
5.Why is long arm jurisdiction an issue for those who create or post Web pages?
6.According to the Wolf article, the courts have imposed an "interactive-passive" test of jurisdiction. Explain that distinction.
7.According to the Wolf article, is advertising on the Web alone enough to confer personal jurisdiction?
Answers
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.