Let's evaluate the relevance of each piece of evidence to the argument that schools should run throughout the year with several short breaks instead of closing for the summer.
-
Students lose some of their learning when they have a long summer break.
Relevance: Relevant - This directly supports the claim by highlighting the negative impact of long summer breaks on student learning. -
Many students prefer to learn by doing projects instead of by reading books.
Relevance: Not Relevant - While this speaks to student learning preferences, it does not directly address the argument for year-round schooling versus summer breaks. -
Year-round school allows facilities to avoid overcrowding because student groups can be staggered.
Relevance: Relevant - This supports the argument by presenting a logistical benefit of year-round schooling related to facility usage. -
Many schools offer programming before and after school to supplement learning.
Relevance: Not Relevant - This discusses supplemental programs rather than the effectiveness or necessity of year-round education compared to traditional summer breaks.
In summary:
-
Relevant
- Students lose some of their learning when they have a long summer break.
- Year-round school allows facilities to avoid overcrowding because student groups can be staggered.
-
Not Relevant
- Many students prefer to learn by doing projects instead of by reading books.
- Many schools offer programming before and after school to supplement learning.
1 answer