Scenario

Question

The Friendly Dawg is a retail pet supply store owned by Dave Dawgs. Dave has worked in the store since high school and took over running the store after his father died two years ago. Originally the store sold only pet food and supplies, such as animal food, bird cages, water bowls, pet beds, and so forth. Upon taking ownership, Dave added fish tanks with fish for sale. Recently he built a kennel and cages in a former storage area in the rear of the store in order to sell live animals, such as snakes, birds, dogs, and cats. Landlord Lou came by during renovations and asked what was going on. One of Dave’s employees told Lou that The Friendly Dawg was expanding its inventory and needed the space. Landlord Lou told the employee, “Very exciting! Good luck!”

A few weeks later, landlord Lou began receiving complaints from the neighboring tenant, the Sunshine Yoga studio, that the noise from the dogs and parrots was very disruptive.

The signed lease between Dave Dawg’s deceased father and Lou describes the business as a pet supply store only and does not mention selling live animals. The lease specifies a rent in the amount of $500 a month. Sunshine Yoga does not have a written lease. The owner of Sunshine Yoga, Jasmine, met Lou one night in a bar two years ago where he verbally offered to rent her the space for $300 a month. Jasmine claims that landlord Lou told her that night that she could rent from him forever and that he would never evict her.

Lou called Dave, asking him to quiet the animals. Dave said he would try, but the complaints from Jasmine continued. Dave also demanded that Lou improve the air-conditioning system, claiming it was too hot in the rear of the store for his animals and it was causing them to become agitated. Landlord Lou refused, claiming that air-conditioning was not meant to cool that area and it was not his job as landlord to take care of live animals.

Dave stopped paying his rent, claiming that he was not obligated to do so because Lou was breaching his obligation under the lease to maintain the property in good repair. The next day, a dangerous snake escaped through the air vents and slithered into the neighboring yoga studio, frightening Jasmine, the owner, such that she had a heart attack.

After recovering, Jasmine stopped paying her rent, claiming that the premises were unsafe due to the presence of wild animals. She also claimed that she has been very depressed and anxious as a result of the ongoing situation. And she contends that she has lost clients because of the noise coming from The Friendly Dawg.

The Friendly Dawg has been a good tenant, enjoys a strong customer base, and pays more in rent than Sunshine Yoga. Sunshine Yoga has always been late with rent, and Jasmine constantly bothers Lou over minor issues.

Directions
Write two short papers—one on contract law and one on tort law.

Contract Law
Evaluate the potential rights, claims, defenses, obligations, and remedies for each party from the perspective of contract law. Determine whether landlord Lou has a right to evict either party. Use reliable resources, such as the textbook and other course resources, to support your evaluation. Specifically, include the following components in your evaluation:

Contract between The Friendly Dawg and landlord Lou
Analyze the scenario to determine whether a valid contract still exists between The Friendly Dawg and landlord Lou.
Explain the elements of a valid contract, and identify which contract elements, if any, exist between The Friendly Dawg and landlord Lou.
Analyze the potential rights, claims, defenses, obligations, and remedies available to both landlord Lou and The Friendly Dawg in this scenario.
Support your analysis by referencing specific legal principles or laws.
Contract between Sunshine Yoga and landlord Lou
Analyze the scenario to determine whether a valid contract still exists between Sunshine Yoga and landlord Lou.
Explain the elements of a valid contract, and identify which contract elements, if any, exist between Sunshine Yoga and landlord Lou.
Analyze the potential rights, claims, defenses, obligations, and remedies available to both landlord Lou and Sunshine Yoga in this scenario.
Support your analysis by referencing specific legal principles or laws.
Grounds to evict
Describe whether, based on your analysis of each party’s rights and obligations, landlord Lou has the grounds to evict either The Friendly Dawg or Sunshine Yoga.
Support your conclusions by referencing specific legal principles or laws.
Include a References section and cite your sources using APA style.
Tort Law
Evaluate the implications of tort law in this scenario and what legal claims Sunshine Yoga might have. Use reliable resources, such as the textbook and other course resources, to support your evaluation. Specifically, include the following components in your evaluation:

Tort law: Define what tort law is and how torts may affect business practices.
Relevant tort laws: Identify tort laws relevant to the scenario, specifically the incident involving the snake.
Legal claims
Identify what legal claims Sunshine Yoga might have against The Friendly Dawg and landlord Lou, based on those tort laws and related legal principles.
Support your conclusions by referencing the applicable tort laws and related legal principles.
Include a References section and cite your sources using APA style.

Answer 1

Contract Law

Contract between The Friendly Dawg and Landlord Lou

Validity of Contract: In analyzing whether a valid contract exists between The Friendly Dawg and Landlord Lou, we must consider the elements of a valid contract: offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity, legality, and intention to create legal relations.

1. Offer: The original lease, signed between Lou and Dave's father, constitutes an offer to lease the premises at $500 per month for use as a pet supply store.
2. Acceptance: The acceptance was evident when Dave took over the lease, as tenants take on existing contracts unless explicitly stated otherwise.
3. Consideration: The consideration is the rental payments of $500 for the use of the premises.
4. Capacity: Both Lou and Dave have the requisite capacity; Lou as the landlord and Dave as the legal successor to the lease upon his father's death.
5. Legality: The lease's purpose is legal (operating a pet supply store). However, the addition of live animals will be evaluated under zoning laws or lease terms.
6. Intention: Both parties intended to create a valid lease agreement.

Since all elements seem present, a valid contract does exist between The Friendly Dawg and Lou.

Rights, Claims, Defenses, Obligations, and Remedies:

• Lou’s Rights: Lou has the right to enforce the lease terms, including maintaining a pet supply store as per the original agreement. He could argue that Dave breached the lease by expanding into selling live animals, which was not specified in their agreement.
• Dave’s Claims and Defenses: Dave argues Lou has failed to maintain the premises, notably the air conditioning needed for the animals, which could be regarded as a breach of the implied warranty of habitability. He claims this justifies withholding rent.
• Remedies: Lou could seek back rent or evictions based on breach, but must first demonstrate that any aesthetic or noise complaints do not amount to a lease breach. Dave can counterclaim for damages due to the alleged lack of property maintenance.

Contract between Sunshine Yoga and Landlord Lou

Validity of Contract:

1. Offer: The argument relies on Lou’s verbal offer to Jasmine, which she asserts included a promise of indefinite leasing.
2. Acceptance: Jasmine occupying the premises and paying rent demonstrates acceptance.
3. Consideration: The $300 monthly payment represents consideration.
4. Capacity: Both Jasmine and Lou have the legal capacity to enter agreements.
5. Legality: The rental agreement's legality stands as long as the rented property is used appropriately.
6. Intention: The intention to contract for an indefinite time can be implicit in long-term rentals.

Despite the absence of a written lease, some elements may suffice for a verbal contract, which can still be enforceable if the parties acted upon it.

Rights, Claims, Defenses, Obligations, and Remedies:

• Jasmine’s Rights: Jasmine has rights to quiet enjoyment of her property. She may claim a breach if excessive noise or unsafe conditions arise from The Friendly Dawg.
• Lou’s Obligations: Lou is obligated to ensure that Jasmine can enjoy the premises without significant disruption; he may be liable if the animals constitute a nuisance.
• Remedies: Jasmine can seek damages for emotional distress and decreased clientele due to Lou's alleged negligence in allowing The Friendly Dawg to create disturbing conditions.

Grounds to Evict

• For The Friendly Dawg: Lou has potential grounds for eviction based on the breach of the lease agreement by expanding into live animal sales, which is unauthorized per the terms of the lease.
• For Sunshine Yoga: Although Jasmine can be considered a tenant without a formal lease, her claims of unsafe conditions must be substantiated. Should Jasmine’s complaints and the snake incident warrant concern for disturbance or safety, Lou may have grounds to require compliance or even terminate Jasmine's occupancy.

References

• Legal aspects related to tenant-landlord relationships.
• Lease agreements and rights of tenants.

---

Tort Law

Definition of Tort Law

Tort law governs civil wrongs, allowing individuals to seek compensation for damages caused by the wrongful act (tort) of another party. This body of law aims to provide remedies to injured parties and deter similar behavior in the future. Businesses face tort liabilities, impacting their operations, safety practices, and overall risk management.

Relevant Tort Laws

The torts applicable in this scenario include:

1. Negligence: Lou may be liable if he failed to exercise reasonable care as a landlord to maintain a safe environment, resulting in Jasmine's heart attack.
2. Nuisance: The noise from The Friendly Dawg could be classified as a nuisance, disturbing Jasmine’s use of her premises.
3. Strict Liability: If the snake incident can be traced back to The Friendly Dawg’s operations, strict liability may apply, as the sale and maintenance of potentially dangerous animals holds inherent risks.

Legal Claims

1. Claims by Sunshine Yoga against The Friendly Dawg:

   • Negligence: Jasmine can assert that The Friendly Dawg failed to secure the animals properly, allowing a dangerous snake to escape, leading to emotional and physical damages.
   • Nuisance: The persistent noise from the animals may constitute a nuisance, affecting Jasmine's business operations and client relations.

2. Claims by Sunshine Yoga against Landlord Lou:

   • Negligence: Jasmine can argue that Lou, as the property owner, did not ensure safety or quiet enjoyment of her business premises, which contributed to her distress and health crisis.

Conclusion: Both The Friendly Dawg and landlord Lou recognize possible liabilities under tort law stemming from the disturbances caused and physical distress incurred by Sunshine Yoga. Jasmine may have a robust basis for pursuing legal claims against both parties for their actions leading to her current predicament.

References

• Tort law principles including negligence and nuisance law.