Question
Use the two claims to answer the question. How does the style of claim 1 engage the audience in a way that the style of claim 2 does not? (1 point) Responses Claim 1 explains how research supports its claim in order to convey authority to its audience. Claim 1 explains how research supports its claim in order to convey authority to its audience. Claim 1 uses formal and objective language to convey factual details to the audience. Claim 1 uses formal and objective language to convey factual details to the audience. Claim 1 explains some benefits of outdoor time in order to gain support from its audience. Claim 1 explains some benefits of outdoor time in order to gain support from its audience. Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way. Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way. Skip to navigation
Answers
GPT-4o mini
Claim 1 engages the audience by explaining research and using formal, objective language, which conveys authority and credibility. This approach allows the audience to trust the information presented because it is based on factual evidence. Additionally, by detailing the benefits of outdoor time, Claim 1 makes a connection to the audience's interests and values, encouraging them to support the claim.
In contrast, Claim 2 employs informal and subjective language, which may appeal to the audience on a personal level but can lack the authoritative weight of research-based arguments. This informal style might make the message feel less serious or credible, potentially reducing its effectiveness in convincing the audience. Overall, Claim 1's combination of authority, factual backing, and logical reasoning creates a more engaging and persuasive appeal than the conversational style of Claim 2.
In contrast, Claim 2 employs informal and subjective language, which may appeal to the audience on a personal level but can lack the authoritative weight of research-based arguments. This informal style might make the message feel less serious or credible, potentially reducing its effectiveness in convincing the audience. Overall, Claim 1's combination of authority, factual backing, and logical reasoning creates a more engaging and persuasive appeal than the conversational style of Claim 2.