Which statement best analyzes the disadvantages of lifetime appointments for federal judges?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Less frequent turnover creates problems with positions being available for new judges being appointed.
Less frequent turnover creates problems with positions being available for new judges being appointed.

Diminished mental clarity and stamina could impede judges from fully carrying out their assigned duties without age and term limits.
Diminished mental clarity and stamina could impede judges from fully carrying out their assigned duties without age and term limits.

Judges are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, making them more vulnerable to influenced decision making.
Judges are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, making them more vulnerable to influenced decision making.

Appointment by the president who appointed them can sway their rulings.

Answer 1

The statement that best analyzes the disadvantages of lifetime appointments for federal judges is:

Diminished mental clarity and stamina could impede judges from fully carrying out their assigned duties without age and term limits.

This statement directly addresses a potential disadvantage of lifetime appointments by highlighting concerns related to judges' capabilities over time, which can impact their performance and decision-making.