Asked by John
An Illinois state statute bans certain advertising to prevent consumers from being misled. A court would likely hold this statute to be
1. justified by the need to protect individuals' rights.
2. an unconstitutional restriction of speech.
3. necessary to protect state interests.
4. constitutional under the First Amendment.
1. justified by the need to protect individuals' rights.
2. an unconstitutional restriction of speech.
3. necessary to protect state interests.
4. constitutional under the First Amendment.
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
Once you write up <b>YOUR THOUGHTS</b>, please re-post, and someone here will be happy to comment.