7. How do the authors of “Reaching Great Heights” and “A Monumental Feat” present their topics differently?

Question

(1 point)
Responses

The author of “A Monumental Feat” gives a historical perspective, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” does not.
The author of “A Monumental Feat” gives a historical perspective, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” does not.

The author of “A Monumental Feat” has visited the Eiffel Tower, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” has not visited the Empire State Building.
The author of “A Monumental Feat” has visited the Eiffel Tower, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” has not visited the Empire State Building.

The author of “A Monumental Feat” is clearly awed by the Eiffel Tower, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” is not very interested in the Empire State Building.
The author of “A Monumental Feat” is clearly awed by the Eiffel Tower, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” is not very interested in the Empire State Building.

The author of “A Monumental Feat” describes positive and negative public opinions, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” focuses on the positive.

Answer 1

The correct response is:

The author of “A Monumental Feat” describes positive and negative public opinions, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” focuses on the positive.

This response highlights a key difference in how each author presents their respective topics, emphasizing the range of perspectives in one piece versus a more positive focus in the other.