To find viable solutions for the number of robotics kits (y) and chemistry sets (x) Cindy can purchase, we can set up the following equation based on her winnings of $50.00:
\[ 10y + 8x = 50 \]
Now we'll evaluate each of the provided options:
-
(0, 5):
- Substitute \(y = 0\) and \(x = 5\) into the equation: \[ 10(0) + 8(5) = 0 + 40 = 40 \quad (\text{Not valid, less than } 50) \]
-
(−5, 9):
- Substitute \(y = -5\) and \(x = 9\) into the equation: \[ 10(-5) + 8(9) = -50 + 72 = 22 \quad (\text{Not valid, cannot buy a negative quantity}) \]
-
(3, 2.6):
- Substitute \(y = 3\) and \(x = 2.6\) into the equation: \[ 10(3) + 8(2.6) = 30 + 20.8 = 50.8 \quad (\text{Not valid, exceeds } 50) \]
-
(5, 1):
- Substitute \(y = 5\) and \(x = 1\) into the equation: \[ 10(5) + 8(1) = 50 + 8 = 58 \quad (\text{Not valid, exceeds } 50) \]
Based on this analysis, none of the provided options calculate to a valid purchase that uses exactly $50. However, if we want to check which solution is closest or fits the criteria of values greater than or equal to $0 and spending exactly $50, we find that only non-listed pairs would satisfy spending exactly their winnings, while having values \(x \geq 0\) and \(y \geq 0\).
Thus, according to the provided options, none of them are valid.