To analyze the data:
-
For Parents with Kids Under 10:
- Non-Season Pass Holders: 52
- Season Pass Holders: 125
- Total: 177
Percentage of Non-Season Pass Holders with Kids Under 10: \( \frac{52}{177} \approx 29.4% \)
-
For Parents with Kids from 10–18:
- Non-Season Pass Holders: 50
- Season Pass Holders: 58
- Total: 108
Percentage of Non-Season Pass Holders with Kids from 10–18: \( \frac{50}{108} \approx 46.3% \)
From this analysis, we see that a greater percentage of parents with children aged 10-18 are non-season pass holders compared to those with children under 10.
Now let's evaluate the provided statements:
-
The older the children, the more likely it is that a parent has a season pass.
- This is not true because there are more non-season pass holders among the parents of children 10-18.
-
The majority of non-season pass holders have children under 10.
- This is not true; the proportion of non-season pass holders in the under 10 category versus the 10-18 category does not show the majority.
-
There is an association between the ages of children and whether a parent is a season pass holder.
- This statement is supported by the data, as the distribution of season pass holders versus non-season pass holders varies with the age of children.
-
There is no association between the age of children and whether a parent is a season pass holder.
- This is incorrect as we can see a difference in the proportions.
Based on this evaluation, the most accurate statement regarding the data is:
There is an association between the ages of children and whether a parent is a season pass holder.